FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 4006 vs 4145

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 4006 and 4145 are both aluminum grades, both heat resistant al. 4006 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 4145, about 14% more. In exchange, 4145 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for 4006, and 4145 is harder (60 HB vs 42 HB). 4145 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous) and 4006 conducts heat better (185 W/m·K vs 130 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4006 welds better (very good vs fair) and 4006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4145 (standard, $$).

4006Choose it when strength drives the design, or when it will be welded.

4145Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

4006 vs 4145: properties

40064145

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
27 GPa3.9 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
205 MPa29.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
110 MPa16 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
8%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
130 MPa18.9 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
70 MPa10.2 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
60 HB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 71 GPa10.3 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.75 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
516°C961 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
585°C1,085 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
130 W/m·K75.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
880 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
20.7 µm/m·K11.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
—

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
31 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.2 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.78 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
45%

Weldability

78 / 100
45 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
80 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb
1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
75 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
26.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

113 kJ/m³
84 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
53.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40064145

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40064145
CNC machining—Yes
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
DLC—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

4006 vs 4145 — frequently asked

Is 4006 stronger than 4145?

Yes. 4006 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 110 MPa (16 ksi) for 4145 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 205 MPa (29.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4006 or 4145?

4006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4145 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 4006 or 4145?

4145, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 38/100 for 4006; for welding the order is 4006 first (very good, 78/100) then 4145 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4006 and 4145 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.