FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 4006 vs 4015

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 4006 and 4015 are both aluminum grades. 4006 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for 4015, about 127% more; tensile strength follows at 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 120 MPa (17.4 ksi). In exchange, 4015 is the more ductile: elongation 26% versus 5% for 4006, and 4006 is harder (42 HB vs 31 HB). 4015 runs hotter in service (175°C vs 120°C continuous) and 4006 conducts heat better (185 W/m·K vs 165 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4015 welds better (excellent vs very good) and 4006 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 4015 (premium, $$$).

4006Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

4015Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

4006 vs 4015: properties

40064015

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

26 GPa3.8 Msi
26.4 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
73 GPa10.6 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

145 MPa21 ksi
120 MPa17.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
26%

Shear Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

55 MPa8 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

42 HB
31 HB

Hardness, Vickers

—
34 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.7 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.69 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Same in both: Melting Point (Solidus) 630°C1,166 °F · Liquidus Temperature 655°C1,211 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

185 W/m·K107 BTU/hr·ft·°F
165 W/m·K95.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

395 J/g170 BTU/lb
393 J/g169 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
175°C347 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

46 % IACS
43 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

3.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.48 µΩ·in
4×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.57 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.75 V
-0.76 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
64 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

38 / 100
32 / 100

Weldability

78 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
90 / 100

Castability

60 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
35%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

54 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.6 MN·m/kg
26 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

113 kJ/m³
22 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

76.1 mm²/s
68.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale40064015

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability40064015
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

4006 vs 4015 — frequently asked

Is 4006 stronger than 4015?

Yes. 4006 has a typical yield strength of 125 MPa (18.1 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for 4015 — about 127% more. Tensile strength is 145 MPa (21 ksi) vs 120 MPa (17.4 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4006 or 4015?

4006 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 4015 is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 4006 or 4015?

4006. Its machinability rates fair (38/100) against poor (32/100) for 4015; for welding the order is 4015 first (excellent, 88/100) then 4006 (very good, 78/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4006 and 4015 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.