FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3005 vs 3102

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3005 and 3102 are both aluminum grades. 3005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 3102, about 4.4 times as much; tensile strength follows at 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi). In exchange, 3102 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 5% for 3005, and 3005 is harder (48 HB vs 23 HB). 3102 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 3102 conducts heat better (215 W/m·K vs 163 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 3005 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 3005 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 3102 (standard, $$).

3005Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

3102Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

3005 vs 3102: properties

30053102

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
35%

Shear Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
23 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Bulk Modulus 70 GPa10.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
658°C1,216 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

41 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in
3.25×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Weldability

85 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
97 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 30%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

174 kJ/m³
9 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

66.9 mm²/s
88.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30053102

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30053102
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

3005 vs 3102 — frequently asked

Is 3005 stronger than 3102?

Yes. 3005 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 3102 — about 4.4 times as much. Tensile strength is 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3005 or 3102?

3005 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 3102 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 3005 or 3102?

3005. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (25/100) for 3102; for welding the order is 3102 first (excellent, 90/100) then 3005 (excellent, 85/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3005 and 3102 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.