FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3003 vs 3102

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3003 and 3102 are both aluminum grades. 3003 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 3102, about 4.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi). In exchange, 3102 is the more ductile: elongation 35% versus 10% for 3003, and 3003 is harder (40 HB vs 23 HB). 3102 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous) and 3102 conducts heat better (215 W/m·K vs 159 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 3003 machines more easily (fair vs poor) and 3003 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than 3102 (standard, $$).

3003Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

3102Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

3003 vs 3102: properties

30033102

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

68.9 GPa10 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Shear Modulus

25 GPa3.6 Msi
26 GPa3.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

69 GPa10 Msi
70 GPa10.2 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

150 MPa21.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

145 MPa21 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
35%

Shear Strength

96 MPa13.9 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

62 MPa9 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

40 HB
23 HB

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.71 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

643°C1,189 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Liquidus Temperature

654°C1,209 °F
658°C1,216 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
215 W/m·K124 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
900 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F
23.6 µm/m·K13.1 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
397 J/g171 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

41 % IACS
53 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in
3.25×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
72 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.83 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
97 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

90 / 100
85 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
30%

Same in both: Weldability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb
200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

55 kN·m/kg
33 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.2 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

153 kJ/m³
9 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

65.2 mm²/s
88.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

15
12

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30033102

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30033102
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Anodizing Type IIYes—
CerakoteYes—
Chem Film (Alodine)Yes—
DLCYes—
E-CoatingYes—
ElectropolishingYes—
Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFEYes—
Hard Anodizing Type IIIYes—
Nickel PlatingYes—
PTFE CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Powder CoatingYes—

They share 4 finishes: Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Silver Plating.

3003 vs 3102 — frequently asked

Is 3003 stronger than 3102?

Yes. 3003 has a typical yield strength of 145 MPa (21 ksi) against 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) for 3102 — about 4.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 150 MPa (21.8 ksi) vs 90 MPa (13.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3003 or 3102?

3003 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while 3102 is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 3003 or 3102?

3003. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (25/100) for 3102.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3003 and 3102 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.