FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 3005 vs 3203

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 3005 and 3203 are both aluminum grades, both corrosion resistant al. 3005 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 3203, about 7% more; tensile strength follows at 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 150 MPa (21.8 ksi). In exchange, 3203 is the more ductile: elongation 8% versus 5% for 3005, and 3005 is harder (48 HB vs 40 HB). 3203 runs hotter in service (150°C vs 120°C continuous). On the shop floor, 3203 machines more easily (45 vs 35 out of 100).

3005Choose it when strength drives the design.

3203Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

3005 vs 3203: properties

30053203

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

70 GPa10.2 Msi
69 GPa10 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

175 MPa25.4 ksi
150 MPa21.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

155 MPa22.5 ksi
145 MPa21 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
8%

Shear Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
97 MPa14.1 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

65 MPa9.4 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

48 HB
40 HB

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 69 GPa10 Msi · Shear Modulus 26 GPa3.8 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

630°C1,166 °F
643°C1,189 °F

Liquidus Temperature

655°C1,211 °F
654°C1,209 °F

Same in both: Density 2.73 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

163 W/m·K94.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F
159 W/m·K91.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23.8 µm/m·K13.2 µin/in·°F
23.2 µm/m·K12.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

397 J/g171 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-270°C-454 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 893 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 41 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.2×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.65 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.84 V
-0.83 V

Corrosion Resistance

68 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
90%

Weldability

85 / 100
88 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 70 / 100 · Polishability 45 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

12.5 kg CO₂/kg
12 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

35%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb · Embodied Water 1,200 L/kg144 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

64 kN·m/kg
55 kN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

174 kJ/m³
152 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

66.9 mm²/s
65.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

17
15

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 25.3 MN·m/kg

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale30053203

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability30053203
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 15 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating and 3 more.

3005 vs 3203 — frequently asked

Is 3005 stronger than 3203?

Yes. 3005 has a typical yield strength of 155 MPa (22.5 ksi) against 145 MPa (21 ksi) for 3203 — about 7% more. Tensile strength is 175 MPa (25.4 ksi) vs 150 MPa (21.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 3005 or 3203?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 3005 or 3203?

3203, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 35/100 for 3005.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 3005 and 3203 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.