FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2218 vs 2618

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2218 and 2618 are both aluminum grades, both heat resistant al. 2618 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 372 MPa (54 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for 2218, about 22% more; tensile strength follows at 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 405 MPa (58.7 ksi).

2618Choose it when strength drives the design.

2218 vs 2618: properties

22182618

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

74 GPa10.7 Msi
74.5 GPa10.8 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

405 MPa58.7 ksi
440 MPa63.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

305 MPa44.2 ksi
372 MPa54 ksi

Elongation at Break

11%
10%

Compressive Strength

310 MPa45 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Shear Strength

255 MPa37 ksi
260 MPa37.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

105 MPa15.2 ksi
125 MPa18.1 ksi

Reduction in Area

—
20%

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
28 MPa·√m25.5 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
70 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

—
125 HV

Same in both: Shear Modulus 28 GPa4.1 Msi · Bulk Modulus 76 GPa11 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 115 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.76 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

505°C941 °F
549°C1,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

635°C1,175 °F
638°C1,180 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
146 W/m·K84.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
875 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F
22.3 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
389 J/g167 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 200°C392 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

38 % IACS
37 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in
4.66×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.83 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.66 V
-0.7 V

Corrosion Resistance

33 / 100
32 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

72 / 100
65 / 100

Formability (cold)

28 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

18 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

—
150%

Castability

—
20 / 100

Same in both: Weldability 22 / 100 · Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Typical Recycled Content

20%
5%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

144 kN·m/kg
159 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.3 MN·m/kg
27 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

629 kJ/m³
929 kJ/m³

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

36
39

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 60.5 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale22182618

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability22182618
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2218 vs 2618 — frequently asked

Is 2618 stronger than 2218?

Yes. 2618 has a typical yield strength of 372 MPa (54 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for 2218 — about 22% more. Tensile strength is 440 MPa (63.8 ksi) vs 405 MPa (58.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2218 or 2618?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2218 or 2618?

2218. Its machinability rates very good (72/100) against good (65/100) for 2618.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2218 and 2618 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.