FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2017A vs 2218

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2017A and 2218 are both aluminum grades. 2218 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 2017A, about 17% more. In exchange, 2017A is the more ductile: elongation 14% versus 11% for 2218. 2218 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2218 conducts electricity better (38 % IACS vs 34 % IACS).

2017AChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2218Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

2017A vs 2218: properties

2017A2218

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.5 GPa10.5 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

75 GPa10.9 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

410 MPa59.5 ksi
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

14%
11%

Compressive Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

260 MPa37.7 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

110 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

62 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

118 HV
—

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.79 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

512°C954 °F
505°C941 °F

Liquidus Temperature

641°C1,186 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

134 W/m·K77.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

873 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

34 % IACS
38 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.07×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.69 V
-0.66 V

Corrosion Resistance

35 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

75%
—

Weldability

20 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
28 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

25%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

147 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

466 kJ/m³
629 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55 mm²/s
60.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

33
36

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale2017A2218

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability2017A2218
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2017A vs 2218 — frequently asked

Is 2218 stronger than 2017A?

Yes. 2218 has a typical yield strength of 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 2017A — about 17% more. Tensile strength is 405 MPa (58.7 ksi) vs 410 MPa (59.5 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2017A or 2218?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

When should I choose 2017A over 2218?

Pick 2017A when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded. Pick 2218 when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2017A and 2218 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.