FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2007 vs 2218

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2007 and 2218 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 300 MPa — strength does not separate them. 2218 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2218 conducts electricity better (38 % IACS vs 30 % IACS). On the shop floor, 2007 machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

2007Choose it when the part is machined in volume.

2218Choose it when the part sees heat.

2007 vs 2218: properties

20072218

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72 GPa10.4 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

27 GPa3.9 Msi
28 GPa4.1 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

390 MPa56.6 ksi
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

10%
11%

Shear Strength

235 MPa34.1 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

27 MPa·√m24.6 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

65 HRB
—

Compressive Strength

—
310 MPa45 ksi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.33 · Hardness, Brinell 115 HB

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.85 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

508°C946 °F
505°C941 °F

Liquidus Temperature

640°C1,184 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

135 W/m·K78 BTU/hr·ft·°F
147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

860 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

23 µm/m·K12.8 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

120°C248 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
38 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.75×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.26 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.68 V
-0.66 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

95 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

300%
—

Weldability

15 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
28 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Embodied Water 1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

137 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.3 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

625 kJ/m³
629 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

55.1 mm²/s
60.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

32
36

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale20072218

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20072218
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2007 vs 2218 — frequently asked

What is the difference between 2007 and 2218?

Aluminum 2007 and 2218 are both aluminum grades. Both yield at about 300 MPa — strength does not separate them. 2218 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 120°C continuous) and 2218 conducts electricity better (38 % IACS vs 30 % IACS).

Which is cheaper, 2007 or 2218?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2007 or 2218?

2007. Its machinability rates excellent (95/100) against very good (72/100) for 2218; for welding the order is 2218 first (poor, 22/100) then 2007 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2007 and 2218 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.