FabDigitFabDigit

Aluminum 2014 vs 2218

Aluminum · grade comparison

Aluminum 2014 and 2218 are both aluminum grades. 2014 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 414 MPa (60 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for 2218, about 36% more; tensile strength follows at 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) vs 405 MPa (58.7 ksi). 2014 is the more ductile: elongation 13% versus 11% for 2218, and 2014 is harder (135 HB vs 115 HB). 2218 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 150°C continuous).

2014Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

2218Choose it when the part sees heat.

2014 vs 2218: properties

20142218

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

72.4 GPa10.5 Msi
74 GPa10.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

483 MPa70.1 ksi
405 MPa58.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

414 MPa60 ksi
305 MPa44.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

13%
11%

Compressive Strength

425 MPa61.6 ksi
310 MPa45 ksi

Shear Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
255 MPa37 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

125 MPa18.1 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

24 MPa·√m21.8 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Brinell

135 HB
115 HB

Hardness, Vickers

145 HV
—

Same in both: Shear Modulus 28 GPa4.1 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.33

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

2.8 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³
2.81 g/cm³0.1 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

507°C945 °F
505°C941 °F

Liquidus Temperature

638°C1,180 °F
635°C1,175 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

155 W/m·K89.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
147 W/m·K84.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

864 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F
865 J/kg·K0.21 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

22.5 µm/m·K12.5 µin/in·°F
22.4 µm/m·K12.4 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Same in both: Latent Heat of Fusion 390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

40 % IACS
38 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.3×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.69 µΩ·in
4.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m1.77 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.78 V
-0.66 V

Corrosion Resistance

30 / 100
33 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
72 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

200%
—

Weldability

25 / 100
22 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
28 / 100

Castability

25 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

15 / 100
18 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

200 MJ/kg85,985 BTU/lb
205 MJ/kg88,134 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

1,100 L/kg132 gal/lb
1,150 L/kg138 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 12.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

173 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.9 MN·m/kg
26.3 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,184 kJ/m³
629 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

64.1 mm²/s
60.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

46
36

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every aluminum grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

20501002005002.22.42.62.83Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale22182014

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability20142218
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. Both take the same 16 finishes: Anodizing Type II, Cerakote, Chem Film (Alodine), DLC, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Anodize Type III w/ PTFE, Hard Anodizing Type III, Nickel Plating and 4 more.

2014 vs 2218 — frequently asked

Is 2014 stronger than 2218?

Yes. 2014 has a typical yield strength of 414 MPa (60 ksi) against 305 MPa (44.2 ksi) for 2218 — about 36% more. Tensile strength is 483 MPa (70.1 ksi) vs 405 MPa (58.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 2014 or 2218?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 2014 or 2218?

2014, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 72/100 for 2218.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 2014 and 2218 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.