FabDigitFabDigit

Titanium C-9 vs Grade Ti-Pd17

Titanium · grade comparison

Titanium C-9 and Grade Ti-Pd17 are both titanium grades. C-9 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for Grade Ti-Pd17, about 134% more; tensile strength follows at 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi). In exchange, Grade Ti-Pd17 is the more ductile: elongation 18% versus 12% for C-9, and C-9 is harder (240 HB vs 150 HB). Grade Ti-Pd17 conducts heat better (17.5 W/m·K vs 7.6 W/m·K). On the shop floor, Grade Ti-Pd17 machines more easily (fair vs poor).

C-9Choose it when strength drives the design.

Grade Ti-Pd17Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

C-9 vs Grade Ti-Pd17: properties

C-9Grade Ti-Pd17

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

100 GPa14.5 Msi
103 GPa14.9 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
45 GPa6.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.34

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

690 MPa100 ksi
330 MPa47.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
18%

Reduction in Area

20%
32%

Compressive Strength

620 MPa89.9 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Shear Strength

450 MPa65.3 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

340 MPa49.3 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

70 MPa·√m63.7 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

22 J16.2 ft·lbf
38 J28 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

240 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

23 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

255 HV
155 HV

Hardness, Rockwell B

—
80 HRB

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 110 GPa16 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

4.48 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³
4.51 g/cm³0.16 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,650°C3,002 °F
1,660°C3,020 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,700°C3,092 °F
1,670°C3,038 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

7.6 W/m·K4.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
17.5 W/m·K10.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

544 J/kg·K0.13 BTU/lb·°F
523 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

9.4 µm/m·K5.2 µin/in·°F
8.6 µm/m·K4.8 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

365 J/g157 BTU/lb
295 J/g127 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 300°C572 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

1.4 % IACS
3.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.26×10⁻⁶ Ω·m49.6 µΩ·in
5.6×10⁻⁷ Ω·m22 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
97 / 100

Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

25 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

22%
35%

Weldability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
30 / 100

Castability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

42 kg CO₂/kg
40 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
1,500 L/kg180 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 650 MJ/kg279,450 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 35%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

154 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22.3 MN·m/kg
22.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,513 kJ/m³
268 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.1 mm²/s
7.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

6
7

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every titanium grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0004.555.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleC-9Grade Ti-Pd17

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityC-9Grade Ti-Pd17
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 1 finish: Plasma Spray.

C-9 vs Grade Ti-Pd17 — frequently asked

Is C-9 stronger than Grade Ti-Pd17?

Yes. C-9 has a typical yield strength of 550 MPa (79.8 ksi) against 235 MPa (34.1 ksi) for Grade Ti-Pd17 — about 134% more. Tensile strength is 690 MPa (100 ksi) vs 330 MPa (47.9 ksi).

Which is cheaper, C-9 or Grade Ti-Pd17?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, C-9 or Grade Ti-Pd17?

Grade Ti-Pd17. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (25/100) for C-9; for welding the order is Grade Ti-Pd17 first (excellent, 85/100) then C-9 (very good, 80/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in C-9 and Grade Ti-Pd17 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.