FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 4-79 Mo-Permalloy vs Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed)

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 4-79 Mo-Permalloy and Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) are both steel grades. Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) is the stronger of the two: yield strength 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 4-79 Mo-Permalloy, about 3.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). In exchange, 4-79 Mo-Permalloy is the more ductile: elongation 40% versus 1.5% for Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed), and Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) is harder (300 HB vs 120 HB). Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) is lighter (8.2 g/cm³ vs 8.74 g/cm³ for 4-79 Mo-Permalloy) and Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) conducts heat better (43 W/m·K vs 19 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 4-79 Mo-Permalloy machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100) and 4-79 Mo-Permalloy welds better (good vs poor).

4-79 Mo-PermalloyChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

4-79 Mo-Permalloy vs Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed): properties

4-79 Mo-PermalloyFe-Co 50 (unalloyed)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Shear Modulus

80 GPa11.6 Msi
81 GPa11.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

175 GPa25.4 Msi
168 GPa24.4 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

260 MPa37.7 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Elongation at Break

40%
1.5%

Reduction in Area

70%
3%

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Hardness, Brinell

120 HB
300 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

72 HRB
—

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
320 HV

Compressive Strength

—
850 MPa123 ksi

Shear Strength

—
590 MPa85.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
30 MPa·√m27.3 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
3 J2.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Rockwell C

—
32 HRC

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 210 GPa30.5 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.74 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
8.2 g/cm³0.3 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,470°C2,678 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,500°C2,732 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

19 W/m·K11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
43 W/m·K24.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
420 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

12.5 µm/m·K6.9 µin/in·°F
9.5 µm/m·K5.3 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-50°C-58 °F

Latent Heat of Fusion

—
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
23 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
7.5×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.95 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.3 V
-0.55 V

Corrosion Resistance

45 / 100
14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
18%

Weldability

60 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

40 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

140 MJ/kg60,189 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

10 kg CO₂/kg
8.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

20%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
110 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

161 kJ/m³
1,524 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.7 mm²/s
12.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale4-79 Mo-PermalloyFe-Co 50 (unalloyed)

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability4-79 Mo-PermalloyFe-Co 50 (unalloyed)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

4-79 Mo-Permalloy vs Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) — frequently asked

Is Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) stronger than 4-79 Mo-Permalloy?

Yes. Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) has a typical yield strength of 800 MPa (116 ksi) against 260 MPa (37.7 ksi) for 4-79 Mo-Permalloy — about 3.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 4-79 Mo-Permalloy or Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 4-79 Mo-Permalloy or Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed)?

4-79 Mo-Permalloy, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed); for welding the order is 4-79 Mo-Permalloy first (good, 60/100) then Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 4-79 Mo-Permalloy and Fe-Co 50 (unalloyed) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.