Steel 30P105 vs 35W250
Steel · grade comparison
Steel 30P105 and 35W250 are both steel grades. 35W250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 30P105, about 14% more; tensile strength follows at 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi). 35W250 is the more ductile: elongation 12% versus 8% for 30P105, and 35W250 is harder (190 HV vs 180 HV). 35W250 is stiffer (195 GPa vs 120 GPa) and 30P105 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous).
30P105Choose it when the part sees heat.
35W250Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.
30P105 vs 35W250: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Vickers
Compressive Strength
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Melting Point (Solidus)
Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³ · Liquidus Temperature 1,510°C2,750 °F
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Electrical Conductivity
Electrical Resistivity
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)
Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 18 / 100
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Polishability
Brazeability / Solderability
Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45%
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Typical Recycled Content
Same in both: Embodied Water 45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 30P105 | 35W250 |
|---|---|---|
| Sheet metal | — | Yes |
| Default condition | — | Final Annealed |
| Relative cost | $$ Standard | $$ Standard |
| Min. machined wall | — | — |
| Best machined surface | — | — |
| Black Oxide | — | Yes |
| Cerakote | — | Yes |
| Chrome Plating | — | Yes |
| E-Coating | — | Yes |
| Hot-Dip Galvanizing | — | Yes |
| Nickel Plating | — | Yes |
| PTFE Coating | — | Yes |
| Painting | — | Yes |
| Powder Coating | — | Yes |
| Tin Plating | — | Yes |
| Zinc Plating | — | Yes |
| Zinc-Flake (Dip-Spin) Coating | — | Yes |
| Zinc-Nickel Plating | — | Yes |
They share 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.
30P105 vs 35W250 — frequently asked
Is 35W250 stronger than 30P105?
Yes. 35W250 has a typical yield strength of 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 315 MPa (45.7 ksi) for 30P105 — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 350 MPa (50.8 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 30P105 or 35W250?
Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.
Which is easier to machine, 30P105 or 35W250?
35W250, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for 30P105; for welding the order is 30P105 first (fair, 40/100) then 35W250 (fair, 35/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 30P105 and 35W250 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.