FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W250 vs M19

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W250 and M19 are both steel grades, both electrical steel. 35W250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for M19, about 6% more. In exchange, M19 is the more ductile: elongation 25% versus 12% for 35W250, and 35W250 is harder (190 HV vs 150 HV). M19 runs hotter in service (200°C vs 180°C continuous). On the shop floor, M19 welds better (50 vs 35 out of 100).

35W250Choose it when strength drives the design.

M19Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

35W250 vs M19: properties

35W250M19

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
460 MPa66.7 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
25%

Compressive Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
—

Shear Strength

330 MPa47.9 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

210 MPa30.5 ksi
230 MPa33.4 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
72 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
150 HV

Reduction in Area

—
45%

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
480 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

180°C356 °F
200°C392 °F

Same in both: Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C) 11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 260 J/g112 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
3.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
5.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m20.5 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

18 / 100
15 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Weldability

35 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
65 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
50 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
50 / 100

Same in both: Machinability 45 / 100 · Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
55 L/kg6.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
25%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
60 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

332 kJ/m³
289 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.7 mm²/s
6.8 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W250M19

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W250M19
Default conditionFinal AnnealedAnnealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 22 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Hot-Dip Galvanizing, Manganese Phosphate, Nickel Plating and 10 more.

35W250 vs M19 — frequently asked

Is 35W250 stronger than M19?

Yes. 35W250 has a typical yield strength of 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for M19 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 460 MPa (66.7 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W250 or M19?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which welds better, 35W250 or M19?

M19. Its weldability rates fair (50/100) against fair (35/100) for 35W250.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W250 and M19 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.