FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 35W250 vs 35W270

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 35W250 and 35W270 are both steel grades, both electrical steel. 35W250 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 35W270, about 6% more. In exchange, 35W270 is the more ductile: elongation 17% versus 12% for 35W250, and 35W250 is harder (180 HB vs 170 HB). 35W250 is stiffer (195 GPa vs 185 GPa).

35W250Choose it when strength drives the design.

35W270Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

35W250 vs 35W270: properties

35W25035W270

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

195 GPa28.3 Msi
185 GPa26.8 Msi

Shear Modulus

76 GPa11 Msi
72 GPa10.4 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
155 GPa22.5 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

480 MPa69.6 ksi
470 MPa68.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

360 MPa52.2 ksi
340 MPa49.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
17%

Compressive Strength

360 MPa52.2 ksi
—

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

5 J3.7 ft·lbf
—

Hardness, Brinell

180 HB
170 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

82 HRB
86 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

190 HV
180 HV

Same in both: Shear Strength 330 MPa47.9 ksi · Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit) 210 MPa30.5 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,490°C2,714 °F
1,480°C2,696 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,510°C2,750 °F
1,520°C2,768 °F

Same in both: Density 7.65 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F
25 W/m·K14.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F
11.6 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

260 J/g112 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 180°C356 °F · Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.1 % IACS
3.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.7 µΩ·in
5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m19.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.6 V

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 18 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
40 / 100

Weldability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
55 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

30 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
45 / 100

Same in both: Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %) 45%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Water

45 L/kg5.4 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
20%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 32 MJ/kg13,758 BTU/lb · Embodied Carbon (primary production) 2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
61 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

25.5 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

332 kJ/m³
312 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

6.7 mm²/s
7.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 5

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale35W25035W270

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability35W25035W270
Default conditionFinal AnnealedFinal Annealed
Relative cost$$ Standard$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Sheet metal. Both take the same 22 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Copper Plating, E-Coating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Hot-Dip Galvanizing, Manganese Phosphate, Nickel Plating and 10 more.

35W250 vs 35W270 — frequently asked

Is 35W250 stronger than 35W270?

Yes. 35W250 has a typical yield strength of 360 MPa (52.2 ksi) against 340 MPa (49.3 ksi) for 35W270 — about 6% more. Tensile strength is 480 MPa (69.6 ksi) vs 470 MPa (68.2 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 35W250 or 35W270?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$, standard); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 35W250 or 35W270?

35W250, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 45/100 against 40/100 for 35W270; for welding the order is 35W270 first (fair, 40/100) then 35W250 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 35W250 and 35W270 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.