FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs HP9-4-30

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and HP9-4-30 are both steel grades. HP9-4-30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) against 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, about 14% more. HP9-4-30 is harder — 461 HB against 400 HB for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. HP9-4-30 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 186 GPa) and HP9-4-30 conducts heat better (24 W/m·K vs 20.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs fair).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when it will be welded.

HP9-4-30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs HP9-4-30: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelHP9-4-30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
1,655 MPa240 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
13%

Reduction in Area

60%
45%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
1,450 MPa210 ksi

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
995 MPa144 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
100 MPa·√m91 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
34 J25.1 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
461 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
48 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
490 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Yield Strength (0.2% offset) 1,400 MPa203 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.84 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
24 W/m·K13.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
260 J/g112 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-73°C-99 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 3.8 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
25 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
15%

Weldability

70 / 100
45 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 15 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
45 MJ/kg19,347 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
3.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
85 L/kg10.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
211 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
4,900 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
6.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
17

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(200) Maraging SteelHP9-4-30

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging SteelHP9-4-30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs HP9-4-30 — frequently asked

Is HP9-4-30 stronger than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel?

Yes. HP9-4-30 has a typical tensile strength of 1,655 MPa (240 ksi) against 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — about 14% more.

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or HP9-4-30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or HP9-4-30?

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 25/100 for HP9-4-30; for welding the order is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel first (very good, 70/100) then HP9-4-30 (fair, 45/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and HP9-4-30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.