FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 25Cr2Ni4WA

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 25Cr2Ni4WA are both steel grades. 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 990 MPa (144 ksi) for 25Cr2Ni4WA, about 41% more; tensile strength follows at 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) vs 1,130 MPa (164 ksi). 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is harder — 400 HB against 330 HB for 25Cr2Ni4WA — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 25Cr2Ni4WA is stiffer (208 GPa vs 186 GPa) and 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel runs hotter in service (400°C vs 350°C continuous). On the shop floor, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs poor) and 25Cr2Ni4WA sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel (high, $$$$).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

25Cr2Ni4WAChoose it when cost is the deciding factor.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 25Cr2Ni4WA: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel25Cr2Ni4WA

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
208 GPa30.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
1,130 MPa164 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
990 MPa144 ksi

Elongation at Break

12%
13%

Reduction in Area

60%
52%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
1,000 MPa145 ksi

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
680 MPa98.6 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
540 MPa78.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
95 MPa·√m86.5 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
78 J57.5 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
330 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
34 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
345 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
31 W/m·K17.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
460 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
350°C662 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
5.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
15 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
32 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
35%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
20 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
144 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
26.5 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
2,356 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
8.6 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
15

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(200) Maraging Steel25Cr2Ni4WA

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging Steel25Cr2Ni4WA
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 25Cr2Ni4WA — frequently asked

Is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel stronger than 25Cr2Ni4WA?

Yes. 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel has a typical yield strength of 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) against 990 MPa (144 ksi) for 25Cr2Ni4WA — about 41% more. Tensile strength is 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) vs 1,130 MPa (164 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 25Cr2Ni4WA?

25Cr2Ni4WA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which welds better, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 25Cr2Ni4WA?

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel. Its weldability rates very good (70/100) against poor (20/100) for 25Cr2Ni4WA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 25Cr2Ni4WA side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.