FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30NiCrMo16

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 30NiCrMo16 are both steel grades. 30NiCrMo16 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,620 MPa (235 ksi) against 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, about 16% more; tensile strength follows at 1,860 MPa (270 ksi) vs 1,450 MPa (210 ksi). 30NiCrMo16 is harder — 520 HB against 400 HB for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 30NiCrMo16 is stiffer (205 GPa vs 186 GPa) and 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel runs hotter in service (400°C vs 200°C continuous). On the shop floor, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel machines more easily (30 vs 15 out of 100), 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs poor), and 30NiCrMo16 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel (high, $$$$).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

30NiCrMo16Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30NiCrMo16: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30NiCrMo16

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
205 GPa29.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
80 GPa11.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
1,860 MPa270 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
1,620 MPa235 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
48%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
1,680 MPa244 ksi

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
1,120 MPa162 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
780 MPa113 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
80 MPa·√m72.8 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
25 J18.4 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
520 HB

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
53 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
560 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.85 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
33 W/m·K19.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-70°C-94 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
6.8 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
2.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m9.84 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
14 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
15 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
10%

Weldability

70 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
8 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
35 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
36 MJ/kg15,477 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
237 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
26.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
6,401 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
8.9 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
25

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30NiCrMo16

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30NiCrMo16
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30NiCrMo16 — frequently asked

Is 30NiCrMo16 stronger than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel?

Yes. 30NiCrMo16 has a typical yield strength of 1,620 MPa (235 ksi) against 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — about 16% more. Tensile strength is 1,860 MPa (270 ksi) vs 1,450 MPa (210 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 30NiCrMo16?

30NiCrMo16 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 30NiCrMo16?

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 15/100 for 30NiCrMo16; for welding the order is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel first (very good, 70/100) then 30NiCrMo16 (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 30NiCrMo16 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.