FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30CrMnSiNi2A

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 30CrMnSiNi2A are both steel grades. 30CrMnSiNi2A is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) against 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, about 17% more. 30CrMnSiNi2A is harder — 48 HRC against 43 HRC for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. 30CrMnSiNi2A is stiffer (200 GPa vs 186 GPa) and 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel runs hotter in service (400°C vs 250°C continuous). On the shop floor, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs poor) and 30CrMnSiNi2A sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel (high, $$$$).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when the part sees heat, or when it will be welded.

30CrMnSiNi2AChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30CrMnSiNi2A: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30CrMnSiNi2A

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
1,700 MPa247 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
1,450 MPa210 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
50%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
1,550 MPa225 ksi

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
1,020 MPa148 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
65 MPa·√m59.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
45 J33.2 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
48 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
500 HV

Same in both: Bulk Modulus 160 GPa23.2 Msi · Poisson's Ratio 0.3 · Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.8 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
1,420°C2,588 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
1,490°C2,714 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
31 W/m·K17.9 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
470 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
250 J/g107 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

400°C752 °F
250°C482 °F

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
5.7 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
3×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11.8 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
-0.6 V

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
12 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
10 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
30 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
34 MJ/kg14,617 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
60 L/kg7.2 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

30%
20%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
218 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.6 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
5,256 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
8.5 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
23

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30CrMnSiNi2A

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging Steel30CrMnSiNi2A
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs 30CrMnSiNi2A — frequently asked

Is 30CrMnSiNi2A stronger than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel?

Yes. 30CrMnSiNi2A has a typical tensile strength of 1,700 MPa (247 ksi) against 1,450 MPa (210 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — about 17% more.

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 30CrMnSiNi2A?

30CrMnSiNi2A is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or 30CrMnSiNi2A?

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for 30CrMnSiNi2A; for welding the order is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel first (very good, 70/100) then 30CrMnSiNi2A (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and 30CrMnSiNi2A side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.