FabDigitFabDigit

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs Ferrium M54

Steel · grade comparison

Steel 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and Ferrium M54 are both steel grades. Ferrium M54 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 1,725 MPa (250 ksi) against 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, about 23% more; tensile strength follows at 2,020 MPa (293 ksi) vs 1,450 MPa (210 ksi). Ferrium M54 is harder — 55 HRC against 43 HRC for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Ferrium M54 is stiffer (200 GPa vs 186 GPa). On the shop floor, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel welds better (very good vs poor).

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelChoose it when it will be welded.

Ferrium M54Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs Ferrium M54: properties

18Ni(200) Maraging SteelFerrium M54

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

186 GPa27 Msi
200 GPa29 Msi

Shear Modulus

71 GPa10.3 Msi
78 GPa11.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

160 GPa23.2 Msi
163 GPa23.6 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,450 MPa210 ksi
2,020 MPa293 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1,400 MPa203 ksi
1,725 MPa250 ksi

Reduction in Area

60%
55%

Compressive Strength

1,420 MPa206 ksi
—

Shear Strength

870 MPa126 ksi
1,210 MPa175 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

600 MPa87 ksi
860 MPa125 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

155 MPa·√m141 ksi·√in
110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
27 J19.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

400 HB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

43 HRC
55 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

420 HV
600 HV

Same in both: Elongation at Break 12%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.94 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,413°C2,575 °F
—

Liquidus Temperature

1,450°C2,642 °F
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

20.5 W/m·K11.8 BTU/hr·ft·°F
22 W/m·K12.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

452 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F
450 J/kg·K0.11 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

10.1 µm/m·K5.6 µin/in·°F
11.5 µm/m·K6.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Min Service Temperature

-196°C-321 °F
-73°C-99 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 400°C752 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.8 % IACS
—

Electrical Resistivity

4.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m17.7 µΩ·in
6.5×10⁻⁷ Ω·m25.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.52 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

25 / 100
20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
15%

Weldability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
12 / 100

Castability

45 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

50 / 100
—

Polishability

80 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

7.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

30%
15%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

181 kN·m/kg
254 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

23.3 MN·m/kg
25.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

5,269 kJ/m³
7,439 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.7 mm²/s
6.2 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

16
19

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

2005001,0002,0007.588.5Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale18Ni(200) Maraging SteelFerrium M54

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability18Ni(200) Maraging SteelFerrium M54
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both take the same 9 finishes: Copper Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Manganese Phosphate, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating, Zinc Phosphate.

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel vs Ferrium M54 — frequently asked

Is Ferrium M54 stronger than 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel?

Yes. Ferrium M54 has a typical yield strength of 1,725 MPa (250 ksi) against 1,400 MPa (203 ksi) for 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel — about 23% more. Tensile strength is 2,020 MPa (293 ksi) vs 1,450 MPa (210 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or Ferrium M54?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel or Ferrium M54?

18Ni(200) Maraging Steel, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for Ferrium M54; for welding the order is 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel first (very good, 70/100) then Ferrium M54 (poor, 30/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 18Ni(200) Maraging Steel and Ferrium M54 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.