FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 316L vs Nitronic 50

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 316L and Nitronic 50 are both stainless steel grades, both corrosion resistant ss. Nitronic 50 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316L, about 55% more; tensile strength follows at 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 316L is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 45% for Nitronic 50, and Nitronic 50 is harder (217 HB vs 150 HB). 316L conducts heat better (15 W/m·K vs 12.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 316L machines more easily (fair vs poor), 316L welds better (excellent vs very good), and 316L sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than Nitronic 50 (specialty, $$$$$).

316LChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

Nitronic 50Choose it when strength drives the design.

316L vs Nitronic 50: properties

316LNitronic 50

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

193 GPa28 Msi
196 GPa28.4 Msi

Shear Modulus

77 GPa11.2 Msi
76 GPa11 Msi

Bulk Modulus

166 GPa24.1 Msi
158 GPa22.9 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.27
0.29

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

580 MPa84.1 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

290 MPa42.1 ksi
450 MPa65.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

50%
45%

Reduction in Area

65%
62%

Compressive Strength

290 MPa42.1 ksi
—

Shear Strength

430 MPa62.4 ksi
520 MPa75.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

250 MPa36.3 ksi
380 MPa55.1 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

130 J95.9 ft·lbf
190 J140 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

150 HB
217 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

80 HRB
96 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

155 HV
228 HV

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³
7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,375°C2,507 °F
1,343°C2,449 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,400°C2,552 °F
1,399°C2,550 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
12.5 W/m·K7.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F
502 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F
15.3 µm/m·K8.5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

270 J/g116 BTU/lb
—

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 800°C1,472 °F · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.3 % IACS
2.4 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in
7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.05 V
-0.1 V

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
78 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

40 / 100
28 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

45%
25%

Weldability

90 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
55 / 100

Castability

50 / 100
—

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
72 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
62 MJ/kg26,655 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.3 kg CO₂/kg
4.6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

150 L/kg18 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

65%
45%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

73 kN·m/kg
102 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.2 MN·m/kg
24.9 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

218 kJ/m³
517 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

3.8 mm²/s
3.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale316LNitronic 50

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability316LNitronic 50
3D printingYes—
Default conditionSolution AnnealedSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall0.8 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm
Electropolished (Metal AM)Yes—
Passivated (Metal AM)Yes—
Plated (Metal AM)Yes—

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 32 finishes: AlCrN, AlTiN, Black Oxide, CVD Al2O3, CVD TiCN, CVD TiN, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, CrN, DLC, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing and 20 more.

316L vs Nitronic 50 — frequently asked

Is Nitronic 50 stronger than 316L?

Yes. Nitronic 50 has a typical yield strength of 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316L — about 55% more. Tensile strength is 800 MPa (116 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 316L or Nitronic 50?

316L is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while Nitronic 50 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 316L or Nitronic 50?

316L. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (28/100) for Nitronic 50; for welding the order is 316L first (excellent, 90/100) then Nitronic 50 (very good, 70/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 316L and Nitronic 50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.