FabDigitFabDigit

Stainless Steel 301 vs 316L

Stainless Steel · grade comparison

Stainless Steel 301 and 316L are both stainless steel grades, both corrosion resistant ss. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316L, about 97% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi). In exchange, 316L is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 150 HB). 316L runs hotter in service (800°C vs 425°C continuous). On the shop floor, 316L welds better (excellent vs good) and 301 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 316L (high, $$$$).

301Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

316LChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

301 vs 316L: properties

301316L

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.28
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

900 MPa131 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

570 MPa82.7 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

25%
50%

Reduction in Area

45%
65%

Compressive Strength

580 MPa84.1 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Shear Strength

560 MPa81.2 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

110 MPa·√m100 ksi·√in
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

60 J44.3 ft·lbf
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

270 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

27 HRC
—

Hardness, Vickers

285 HV
155 HV

Same in both: Elastic (Young's) Modulus 193 GPa28 Msi · Shear Modulus 77 GPa11.2 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,395°C2,543 °F
1,375°C2,507 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,420°C2,588 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

16.2 W/m·K9.4 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

16.9 µm/m·K9.4 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

425°C797 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F · Latent Heat of Fusion 270 J/g116 BTU/lb · Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

2.4 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.1 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
45%

Weldability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

65 / 100
85 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

60 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
50 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

53 MJ/kg22,786 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.8 kg CO₂/kg
5.3 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

55%
65%

Same in both: Embodied Water 150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

114 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

24.5 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

842 kJ/m³
218 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

4.1 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

4
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

3005007001,0001,5002,0007.27.47.67.888.2Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale301316L

Manufacturing and finishing

Capability301316L
CNC machining—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionCold RolledSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall—0.8 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electropolished (Metal AM)—Yes
HVOF Coating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Passivated (Metal AM)—Yes
Plated (Metal AM)—Yes
TiAlN—Yes
TiB2—Yes
TiCN—Yes
TiN—Yes
WC/C—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 16 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating, Painting, Passivation (Stainless Steel) and 4 more.

301 vs 316L — frequently asked

Is 301 stronger than 316L?

Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) for 316L — about 97% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 580 MPa (84.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, 301 or 316L?

301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 316L is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, 301 or 316L?

316L, by a small margin. Both rate fair for machinability — 40/100 against 35/100 for 301; for welding the order is 316L first (excellent, 90/100) then 301 (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and 316L side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.