FabDigitFabDigit

Nickel Alloy Monel 400 vs Stainless Steel 316L

Cross-family material comparison

Nickel Alloy Monel 400 is a nickel alloy grade and Stainless Steel 316L is a stainless steel grade — different families, so density, stiffness and cost move together with strength. 316L is the stronger of the two: yield strength 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Monel 400, about 21% more; tensile strength follows at 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi). 316L is the more ductile: elongation 50% versus 45% for Monel 400, and 316L is harder (150 HB vs 125 HB). 316L is lighter (7.98 g/cm³ vs 8.8 g/cm³ for Monel 400) and 316L is stiffer (193 GPa vs 179 GPa). On the shop floor, 316L machines more easily (fair vs poor) and Monel 400 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than 316L (high, $$$$).

Monel 400Choose it when cost is the deciding factor.

316LChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Monel 400 vs 316L: properties

Monel 400316L

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

179 GPa26 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

66 GPa9.6 Msi
77 GPa11.2 Msi

Bulk Modulus

152 GPa22 Msi
166 GPa24.1 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.32
0.27

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

550 MPa79.8 ksi
580 MPa84.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Elongation at Break

45%
50%

Shear Strength

385 MPa55.8 ksi
430 MPa62.4 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

240 MPa34.8 ksi
250 MPa36.3 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

240 J177 ft·lbf
130 J95.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

125 HB
150 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

70 HRB
80 HRB

Hardness, Vickers

130 HV
155 HV

Compressive Strength

—
290 MPa42.1 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
200 MPa·√m182 ksi·√in

Same in both: Reduction in Area 65%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

8.8 g/cm³0.32 lb/in³
7.98 g/cm³0.29 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,300°C2,372 °F
1,375°C2,507 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,350°C2,462 °F
1,400°C2,552 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

21.8 W/m·K12.6 BTU/hr·ft·°F
15 W/m·K8.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

427 J/kg·K0.1 BTU/lb·°F
500 J/kg·K0.12 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

13.9 µm/m·K7.7 µin/in·°F
16 µm/m·K8.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

297 J/g128 BTU/lb
270 J/g116 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

480°C896 °F
800°C1,472 °F

Min Service Temperature

-260°C-436 °F
-196°C-321 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

3.2 % IACS
2.3 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.47×10⁻⁷ Ω·m21.5 µΩ·in
7.4×10⁻⁷ Ω·m29.1 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.05 V

Corrosion Resistance

78 / 100
75 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

35%
45%

Weldability

82 / 100
90 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
85 / 100

Castability

—
50 / 100

Same in both: Formability (cold) 85 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

120 MJ/kg51,591 BTU/lb
75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

9.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.3 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
150 L/kg18 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

35%
65%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
73 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

20.3 MN·m/kg
24.2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

161 kJ/m³
218 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

5.8 mm²/s
3.8 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

5
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.11101001,0005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale316LMonel 400
MetalsPlasticsCeramics & glass

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMonel 400316L
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionOSolution Annealed
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$$ High
Min. machined wall1.5 mm0.8 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 1.6 µmRa 1.6 µm
AlCrN—Yes
AlTiN—Yes
Black Oxide—Yes
CVD Al2O3—Yes
CVD TiCN—Yes
CVD TiN—Yes
Cerakote—Yes
Chrome Plating—Yes
CrN—Yes
DLC—Yes
Electroless Nickel (EN)—Yes
Electropolished (Metal AM)—Yes
Epoxy Coating—Yes
Hard Chrome Plating—Yes
MoS2—Yes
Multilayer CVD—Yes
Nickel Plating—Yes
PTFE Coating—Yes

Both are offered for CNC machining and Sheet metal. They share 5 finishes: Electropolishing, Gold Plating, HVOF Coating, Plasma Spray, Silver Plating.

Monel 400 vs 316L — frequently asked

Is 316L stronger than Monel 400?

Yes. 316L has a typical yield strength of 290 MPa (42.1 ksi) against 240 MPa (34.8 ksi) for Monel 400 — about 21% more. Tensile strength is 580 MPa (84.1 ksi) vs 550 MPa (79.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Monel 400 or 316L?

Monel 400 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while 316L is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Monel 400 or 316L?

316L. Its machinability rates fair (40/100) against poor (30/100) for Monel 400; for welding the order is 316L first (excellent, 90/100) then Monel 400 (very good, 82/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Monel 400 and 316L side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.