Stainless Steel 301 vs Nitronic 50
Stainless Steel · grade comparison
Stainless Steel 301 and Nitronic 50 are both stainless steel grades, both corrosion resistant ss. 301 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for Nitronic 50, about 27% more; tensile strength follows at 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi). In exchange, Nitronic 50 is the more ductile: elongation 45% versus 25% for 301, and 301 is harder (270 HB vs 217 HB). Nitronic 50 runs hotter in service (800°C vs 425°C continuous) and 301 conducts heat better (16.2 W/m·K vs 12.5 W/m·K). On the shop floor, 301 sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Nitronic 50 (specialty, $$$$$).
301Choose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.
Nitronic 50Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.
301 vs Nitronic 50: propertiesHow to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
How to read these bars
- One bar per material. A full bar is the highest value among all stainless steel grades in the FabDigit library; each bar is drawn as a share of that.
- The better value (by the usual engineering direction) is in bold. Rows with no direction — density, thermal conductivity — have no bold.
- Values are typical room-temperature figures for the condition named on each card.
- Confirm against the certified mill or resin datasheet before design release.
Mechanical
Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.
Elastic (Young's) Modulus
Shear Modulus
Bulk Modulus
Poisson's Ratio
Tensile Strength (Ultimate)
Yield Strength (0.2% offset)
Elongation at Break
Reduction in Area
Compressive Strength
Shear Strength
Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)
Fracture Toughness (K_IC)
Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)
Hardness, Brinell
Hardness, Rockwell B
Hardness, Rockwell C
Hardness, Vickers
Physical
Density and transition temperatures.
Melting Point (Solidus)
Liquidus Temperature
Same in both: Density 7.88 g/cm³0.28 lb/in³
Thermal
How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.
Thermal Conductivity
Specific Heat Capacity
Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)
Latent Heat of Fusion
Max Service Temperature (continuous)
Same in both: Min Service Temperature -196°C-321 °F
Electrical
Conductivity and insulation.
Same in both: Electrical Conductivity 2.4 % IACS · Electrical Resistivity 7.2×10⁻⁷ Ω·m28.3 µΩ·in
Chemical & Environmental
Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).
Corrosion Resistance
Same in both: Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE) -0.1 V
Manufacturability
FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.
Machinability
Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)
Weldability
Formability (cold)
Brazeability / Solderability
Polishability
Sustainability
Primary-production footprint per kilogram.
Embodied Energy (primary production)
Embodied Carbon (primary production)
Embodied Water
Typical Recycled Content
Common Calculations
Ratios derived from the values above.
Specific Strength (UTS / density)
Specific Stiffness (E / density)
Modulus of Resilience
Thermal Diffusivity
Thermal Shock Resistance Index
Strength versus weight
Yield strength against density for every stainless steel grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.
Manufacturing and finishing
| Capability | 301 | Nitronic 50 |
|---|---|---|
| CNC machining | — | Yes |
| Default condition | Cold Rolled | Solution Annealed |
| Relative cost | $$$ Premium | $$$$$ Specialty |
| Min. machined wall | — | 0.8 mm |
| Best machined surface | — | Ra 1.6 µm |
| AlCrN | — | Yes |
| AlTiN | — | Yes |
| CVD Al2O3 | — | Yes |
| CVD TiCN | — | Yes |
| CVD TiN | — | Yes |
| CrN | — | Yes |
| DLC | — | Yes |
| HVOF Coating | — | Yes |
| MoS2 | — | Yes |
| Multilayer CVD | — | Yes |
| TiAlN | — | Yes |
| TiB2 | — | Yes |
| TiCN | — | Yes |
| TiN | — | Yes |
| WC/C | — | Yes |
| ZrN | — | Yes |
Both are offered for Sheet metal. They share 16 finishes: Black Oxide, Cerakote, Chrome Plating, Electroless Nickel (EN), Electropolishing, Epoxy Coating, Gold Plating, Hard Chrome Plating, Nickel Plating, PTFE Coating, Painting, Passivation (Stainless Steel) and 4 more.
301 vs Nitronic 50 — frequently asked
Is 301 stronger than Nitronic 50?
Yes. 301 has a typical yield strength of 570 MPa (82.7 ksi) against 450 MPa (65.3 ksi) for Nitronic 50 — about 27% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 800 MPa (116 ksi).
Which is cheaper, 301 or Nitronic 50?
301 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Nitronic 50 is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.
Which is easier to machine, 301 or Nitronic 50?
301. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (28/100) for Nitronic 50; for welding the order is Nitronic 50 first (very good, 70/100) then 301 (good, 65/100).
Ready to make it?
Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in 301 and Nitronic 50 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.
Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.