FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Pure Re vs TZM

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Pure Re and TZM are both refractory metal grades, both high heat refractory. TZM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Pure Re, about 153% more. In exchange, Pure Re is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 15% for TZM, and TZM is harder (255 HB vs 235 HB). TZM is lighter (10.22 g/cm³ vs 21.02 g/cm³ for Pure Re) and Pure Re is stiffer (463 GPa vs 315 GPa). On the shop floor, TZM machines more easily (fair vs not recommended) and Pure Re welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100).

Pure ReChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

TZMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Pure Re vs TZM: properties

Pure ReTZM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

463 GPa67.2 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

178 GPa25.8 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

370 GPa53.7 Msi
260 GPa37.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Elongation at Break

24%
15%

Compressive Strength

1,200 MPa174 ksi
800 MPa116 ksi

Shear Strength

660 MPa95.7 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

400 MPa58 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

16 J11.8 ft·lbf
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

235 HB
255 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

100 HRB
—

Hardness, Rockwell C

22 HRC
26 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

250 HV
270 HV

Same in both: Reduction in Area 45%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

21.02 g/cm³0.76 lb/in³
10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

3,186°C5,767 °F
2,617°C4,743 °F

Liquidus Temperature

3,186°C5,767 °F
2,623°C4,753 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F
118 W/m·K68.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

137 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F
272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

6.2 µm/m·K3.4 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

178 J/g76.5 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

2,000°C3,632 °F
1,300°C2,372 °F

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
20°C68 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

8.9 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.93×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.6 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
45 / 100

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

—
-0.2 V

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

10 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

8%
40%

Weldability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
25 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

55 / 100
65 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

11,000 MJ/kg4,729,153 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

700 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

30%
25%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

52 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

22 MN·m/kg
30.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

97 kJ/m³
917 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

16.7 mm²/s
42.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

18
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTZMPure Re

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPure ReTZM
Default conditionVacuum AnnealedStress Relieved
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pure Re vs TZM — frequently asked

Is TZM stronger than Pure Re?

Yes. TZM has a typical yield strength of 760 MPa (110 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Pure Re — about 153% more. Tensile strength is 900 MPa (131 ksi) vs 1,100 MPa (160 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Pure Re or TZM?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Pure Re or TZM?

TZM. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against not recommended (10/100) for Pure Re; for welding the order is Pure Re first (poor, 30/100) then TZM (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pure Re and TZM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.