FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-La vs Pure Re

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-La and Pure Re are both refractory metal grades, both high heat refractory. Mo-La is the stronger of the two: yield strength 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Pure Re, about 87% more. In exchange, Pure Re is the more ductile: elongation 24% versus 8% for Mo-La. Mo-La is lighter (10.2 g/cm³ vs 21.02 g/cm³ for Pure Re) and Pure Re is stiffer (463 GPa vs 320 GPa). On the shop floor, Mo-La machines more easily (fair vs not recommended) and Pure Re welds better (30 vs 20 out of 100).

Mo-LaChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Pure ReChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Mo-La vs Pure Re: properties

Mo-LaPure Re

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

320 GPa46.4 Msi
463 GPa67.2 Msi

Shear Modulus

122 GPa17.7 Msi
178 GPa25.8 Msi

Bulk Modulus

265 GPa38.4 Msi
370 GPa53.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.31
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

700 MPa102 ksi
1,100 MPa160 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

560 MPa81.2 ksi
300 MPa43.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

8%
24%

Reduction in Area

25%
45%

Compressive Strength

800 MPa116 ksi
1,200 MPa174 ksi

Shear Strength

420 MPa60.9 ksi
660 MPa95.7 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

300 MPa43.5 ksi
400 MPa58 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in
40 MPa·√m36.4 ksi·√in

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

6 J4.4 ft·lbf
16 J11.8 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

228 HB
235 HB

Hardness, Rockwell B

99 HRB
100 HRB

Hardness, Rockwell C

21 HRC
22 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

240 HV
250 HV

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

10.2 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³
21.02 g/cm³0.76 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,620°C4,748 °F
3,186°C5,767 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,620°C4,748 °F
3,186°C5,767 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

120 W/m·K69.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F
48 W/m·K27.7 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

250 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
137 J/kg·K0.03 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F
6.2 µm/m·K3.4 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

390 J/g168 BTU/lb
178 J/g76.5 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

1,700°C3,092 °F
2,000°C3,632 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-269°C-452 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

30 % IACS
8.9 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

5.7×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.24 µΩ·in
1.93×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.6 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
—

Corrosion Resistance

55 / 100
70 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

35 / 100
10 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

40%
8%

Weldability

20 / 100
30 / 100

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

70 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

65 / 100
70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb
11,000 MJ/kg4,729,153 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

25 kg CO₂/kg
700 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

25%
30%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

69 kN·m/kg
52 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

31.4 MN·m/kg
22 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

490 kJ/m³
97 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

47.1 mm²/s
16.7 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

50
18

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleMo-LaPure Re

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-LaPure Re
Default condition—Vacuum Annealed
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-La vs Pure Re — frequently asked

Is Mo-La stronger than Pure Re?

Yes. Mo-La has a typical yield strength of 560 MPa (81.2 ksi) against 300 MPa (43.5 ksi) for Pure Re — about 87% more. Tensile strength is 700 MPa (102 ksi) vs 1,100 MPa (160 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-La or Pure Re?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$$, specialty); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Mo-La or Pure Re?

Mo-La. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against not recommended (10/100) for Pure Re; for welding the order is Pure Re first (poor, 30/100) then Mo-La (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-La and Pure Re side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.