FabDigitFabDigit

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re vs TZM

Refractory Metal · grade comparison

Refractory Metal Mo-41Re and TZM are both refractory metal grades. Mo-41Re is the stronger of the two: yield strength 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for TZM, about 18% more; tensile strength follows at 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi). Mo-41Re is harder — 33 HRC against 26 HRC for TZM — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. TZM is lighter (10.22 g/cm³ vs 13.6 g/cm³ for Mo-41Re) and Mo-41Re is stiffer (360 GPa vs 315 GPa). On the shop floor, TZM machines more easily (fair vs poor), Mo-41Re welds better (very good vs poor), and Mo-41Re forms better (good vs poor).

Mo-41ReChoose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

TZMChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Mo-41Re vs TZM: properties

Mo-41ReTZM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

360 GPa52.2 Msi
315 GPa45.7 Msi

Shear Modulus

138 GPa20 Msi
122 GPa17.7 Msi

Bulk Modulus

300 GPa43.5 Msi
260 GPa37.7 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.32

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1,100 MPa160 ksi
900 MPa131 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

900 MPa131 ksi
760 MPa110 ksi

Reduction in Area

35%
45%

Shear Strength

650 MPa94.3 ksi
500 MPa72.5 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

450 MPa65.3 ksi
350 MPa50.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

35 MPa·√m31.9 ksi·√in
20 MPa·√m18.2 ksi·√in

Hardness, Rockwell C

33 HRC
26 HRC

Hardness, Vickers

330 HV
270 HV

Compressive Strength

—
800 MPa116 ksi

Charpy V-Notch Impact (RT)

—
8 J5.9 ft·lbf

Hardness, Brinell

—
255 HB

Same in both: Elongation at Break 15%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

13.6 g/cm³0.49 lb/in³
10.22 g/cm³0.37 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

2,500°C4,532 °F
2,617°C4,743 °F

Liquidus Temperature

2,560°C4,640 °F
2,623°C4,753 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

45 W/m·K26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
118 W/m·K68.2 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

210 J/kg·K0.05 BTU/lb·°F
272 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

5.8 µm/m·K3.2 µin/in·°F
5.3 µm/m·K2.9 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

300 J/g129 BTU/lb
390 J/g168 BTU/lb

Min Service Temperature

-269°C-452 °F
20°C68 °F

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 1,300°C2,372 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

6.2 % IACS
30 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

2.8×10⁻⁷ Ω·m11 µΩ·in
5.8×10⁻⁸ Ω·m2.28 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

-0.15 V
-0.2 V

Corrosion Resistance

58 / 100
45 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

22 / 100
45 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

15%
40%

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
25 / 100

Same in both: Brazeability / Solderability 65 / 100 · Polishability 70 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

900 MJ/kg386,931 BTU/lb
380 MJ/kg163,371 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

60 kg CO₂/kg
26 kg CO₂/kg

Typical Recycled Content

40%
25%

Embodied Water

—
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

81 kN·m/kg
88 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

26.5 MN·m/kg
30.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

1,125 kJ/m³
917 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

15.8 mm²/s
42.4 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

24
64

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every refractory metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

1502003005007001,0001,5005101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleTZMMo-41Re

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityMo-41ReTZM
Default condition—Stress Relieved
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$$ Specialty
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Mo-41Re vs TZM — frequently asked

Is Mo-41Re stronger than TZM?

Yes. Mo-41Re has a typical yield strength of 900 MPa (131 ksi) against 760 MPa (110 ksi) for TZM — about 18% more. Tensile strength is 1,100 MPa (160 ksi) vs 900 MPa (131 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Mo-41Re or TZM?

Mo-41Re is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while TZM is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Mo-41Re or TZM?

TZM. Its machinability rates fair (45/100) against poor (22/100) for Mo-41Re; for welding the order is Mo-41Re first (very good, 70/100) then TZM (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Mo-41Re and TZM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.