FabDigitFabDigit

Precious Metal Pd99.9 vs Pt90Rh10

Precious Metal · grade comparison

Precious Metal Pd99.9 and Pt90Rh10 are both precious metal grades. Pt90Rh10 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for Pd99.9, about 3.1 times as much; tensile strength follows at 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi). Pt90Rh10 is harder — 88 HB against 40 HB for Pd99.9 — which matters for wear surfaces and threads. Pd99.9 is lighter (12.02 g/cm³ vs 19.97 g/cm³ for Pt90Rh10) and Pt90Rh10 is stiffer (193 GPa vs 121 GPa).

Pd99.9Choose it when weight is the constraint.

Pt90Rh10Choose it when strength drives the design, or when surface hardness matters.

Pd99.9 vs Pt90Rh10: properties

Pd99.9Pt90Rh10

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

121 GPa17.5 Msi
193 GPa28 Msi

Shear Modulus

44 GPa6.4 Msi
71 GPa10.3 Msi

Bulk Modulus

180 GPa26.1 Msi
285 GPa41.3 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

180 MPa26.1 ksi
320 MPa46.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

55 MPa8 ksi
170 MPa24.7 ksi

Reduction in Area

70%
—

Shear Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
200 MPa29 ksi

Fatigue Strength (Endurance Limit)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
—

Hardness, Brinell

40 HB
88 HB

Hardness, Vickers

40 HV
90 HV

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.39 · Elongation at Break 35%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

12.02 g/cm³0.43 lb/in³
19.97 g/cm³0.72 lb/in³

Melting Point (Solidus)

1,555°C2,831 °F
1,850°C3,362 °F

Liquidus Temperature

1,555°C2,831 °F
1,860°C3,380 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

71.8 W/m·K41.5 BTU/hr·ft·°F
30 W/m·K17.3 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

244 J/kg·K0.06 BTU/lb·°F
150 J/kg·K0.04 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

11.8 µm/m·K6.6 µin/in·°F
9 µm/m·K5 µin/in·°F

Latent Heat of Fusion

157 J/g67.5 BTU/lb
118 J/g50.7 BTU/lb

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

500°C932 °F
1,450°C2,642 °F

Min Service Temperature

-253°C-423 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Conductivity

16 % IACS
9.1 % IACS

Electrical Resistivity

1.08×10⁻⁷ Ω·m4.25 µΩ·in
1.9×10⁻⁷ Ω·m7.48 µΩ·in

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Galvanic Potential (seawater, vs SCE)

0.25 V
0.28 V

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
99 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
22 / 100

Machinability Rating (AISI 1212 = 100 %)

30%
20%

Weldability

80 / 100
75 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
92 / 100

Castability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Brazeability / Solderability

85 / 100
60 / 100

Same in both: Polishability 90 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

60,000 MJ/kg2.58×10⁷ BTU/lb
200,000 MJ/kg8.6×10⁷ BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3,900 kg CO₂/kg
14,000 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250,000 L/kg29,957 gal/lb
—

Typical Recycled Content

28%
50%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

15 kN·m/kg
16 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

10.1 MN·m/kg
9.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

13 kJ/m³
75 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

24.5 mm²/s
10 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

9
6

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every precious metal grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

50100200500101520Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePd99.9Pt90Rh10

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPd99.9Pt90Rh10
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Pd99.9 vs Pt90Rh10 — frequently asked

Is Pt90Rh10 stronger than Pd99.9?

Yes. Pt90Rh10 has a typical yield strength of 170 MPa (24.7 ksi) against 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) for Pd99.9 — about 3.1 times as much. Tensile strength is 320 MPa (46.4 ksi) vs 180 MPa (26.1 ksi).

Which is cheaper, Pd99.9 or Pt90Rh10?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Pd99.9 or Pt90Rh10?

Pd99.9, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 22/100 for Pt90Rh10; for welding the order is Pd99.9 first (very good, 80/100) then Pt90Rh10 (very good, 75/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Pd99.9 and Pt90Rh10 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.