FabDigitFabDigit

Silicone vs XNBR

Polymer · grade comparison

Silicone and XNBR are both polymer grades. XNBR is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone, about 3.1 times as much. In exchange, Silicone is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 450% for XNBR. Silicone is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.22 g/cm³ for XNBR) and XNBR is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, XNBR machines more easily (fair vs poor).

SiliconeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

XNBRChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

Silicone vs XNBR: properties

SiliconeXNBR

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi
0.01 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

7.5×10⁻⁴ GPa1.09×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.22 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.49
0.5

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

8 MPa1.2 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Elongation at Break

500%
450%

Hardness, Shore A

50 Shore A
70 Shore A

Tear Strength

25 kN/m143 lbf/in
50 kN/m286 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

20%
25%

Shear Strength

—
14 MPa2 ksi

Hardness, Shore D

—
20 Shore D

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.22 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-125°C-193 °F
-24°C-11 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
1.5%

Refractive Index

1.41
—

Light Transmission

88%
—

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
4%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

270 µm/m·K150 µin/in·°F
220 µm/m·K122 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-25°C-13 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
20%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

250°C482 °F
125°C257 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
16 kV/mm406 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3
6.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.002
0.06

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁰ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

97 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

20 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

20 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
—

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
2.4%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

25°C77 °F
90°C194 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

180°C356 °F
170°C338 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
3%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

7 kN·m/kg
20 kN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

3
4

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSilicone

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySiliconeXNBR
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionMedical Grade—
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

Silicone vs XNBR — frequently asked

Is XNBR stronger than Silicone?

Yes. XNBR has a typical tensile strength of 25 MPa (3.63 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone — about 3.1 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Silicone or XNBR?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Silicone or XNBR?

XNBR. Its machinability rates fair (35/100) against poor (20/100) for Silicone; for welding the order is Silicone first (poor, 20/100) then XNBR (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Silicone and XNBR side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.