FabDigitFabDigit

NBR vs Silicone

Polymer · grade comparison

NBR and Silicone are both polymer grades. NBR is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone, about 100% more. In exchange, Silicone is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 400% for NBR. Silicone is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.25 g/cm³ for NBR) and NBR is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, NBR machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100), Silicone welds better (poor vs not recommended), and NBR sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Silicone (premium, $$$).

NBRChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

SiliconeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

NBR vs Silicone: properties

NBRSilicone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa8.7×10⁻⁴ Msi
0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

16 MPa2.3 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

400%
500%

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.1 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

70 Shore A
50 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

22 Shore D
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

18%
20%

Shear Modulus

—
7.5×10⁻⁴ GPa1.09×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.22 Msi

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.49 · Tear Strength 25 kN/m143 lbf/in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-35°C-31 °F
-125°C-193 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Refractive Index

—
1.41

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,850 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

230 µm/m·K128 µin/in·°F
270 µm/m·K150 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-30°C-22 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

16 kV/mm406 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

6.5
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.05
0.002

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
97 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

10 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

85 / 100
95 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
180°C356 °F

Polishability

—
85 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

220 L/kg26.4 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

13 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSiliconeNBR

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityNBRSilicone
Default conditionSolidMedical Grade
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding. Both take the same 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

NBR vs Silicone — frequently asked

Is NBR stronger than Silicone?

Yes. NBR has a typical tensile strength of 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone — about 100% more.

Which is cheaper, NBR or Silicone?

NBR is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Silicone is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, NBR or Silicone?

NBR, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for Silicone; for welding the order is Silicone first (poor, 20/100) then NBR (not recommended, 10/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in NBR and Silicone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.