FabDigitFabDigit

ACM vs Silicone

Polymer · grade comparison

ACM and Silicone are both polymer grades. ACM is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone, about 38% more. In exchange, Silicone is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 220% for ACM. Silicone is lighter (1.15 g/cm³ vs 1.25 g/cm³ for ACM) and ACM is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, ACM machines more easily (30 vs 20 out of 100).

ACMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

SiliconeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

ACM vs Silicone: properties

ACMSilicone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa8.7×10⁻⁴ Msi
0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
7.5×10⁻⁴ GPa1.09×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.29 Msi
2 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.5
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

11 MPa1.6 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

220%
500%

Hardness, Shore A

70 Shore A
50 Shore A

Hardness, Shore D

22 Shore D
—

Tear Strength

22 kN/m126 lbf/in
25 kN/m143 lbf/in

Same in both: Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C) 20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-25°C-13 °F
-125°C-193 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1%
0.3%

Refractive Index

—
1.41

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,800 J/kg·K0.43 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F
270 µm/m·K150 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-25°C-13 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

20%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

175°C347 °F
250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10⁸ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁵ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

5.5
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.05
0.002

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

75 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

85 / 100
97 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

30 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

70 / 100
95 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
2.5%

Weldability

—
20 / 100

Polishability

—
85 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
25°C77 °F

Same in both: Mold Temperature (typ.) 180°C356 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

9 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

2
3

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSilicone

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityACMSilicone
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Medical Grade
Relative cost$$$ Premium$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

ACM vs Silicone — frequently asked

Is ACM stronger than Silicone?

Yes. ACM has a typical tensile strength of 11 MPa (1.6 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone — about 38% more.

Which is cheaper, ACM or Silicone?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$, premium); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, ACM or Silicone?

ACM, by a small margin. Both rate poor for machinability — 30/100 against 20/100 for Silicone.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in ACM and Silicone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.