FabDigitFabDigit

Dental Resin vs Silicone

Polymer · grade comparison

Dental Resin and Silicone are both polymer grades, both medical plastic. Dental Resin is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone, about 6.9 times as much. In exchange, Silicone is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 6% for Dental Resin. Dental Resin is stiffer (2.2 GPa vs 0 GPa) and Silicone runs hotter in service (200°C vs 70°C continuous). On the shop floor, Dental Resin machines more easily (good vs poor), Silicone welds better (poor vs not recommended), and Silicone sits in a lower cost tier (premium, $$$) than Dental Resin (high, $$$$).

Dental ResinChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

SiliconeChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

Dental Resin vs Silicone: properties

Dental ResinSilicone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0.8 GPa0.12 Msi
7.5×10⁻⁴ GPa1.09×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
2 GPa0.22 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

48 MPa7 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

6%
500%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.3 GPa0.33 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

2.2 GPa0.32 Msi
—

Shear Strength

40 MPa5.8 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.1 MPa·√m1 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

22 J/m0.41 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

85 Shore D
—

Hardness, Rockwell M

85 HRM
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
50 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
25 kN/m143 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
20%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.16 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

78°C172 °F
-125°C-193 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.9%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Refractive Index

1.51
1.41

Light Transmission

85%
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

100 µm/m·K55.6 µin/in·°F
270 µm/m·K150 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

134°C273 °F
250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

15 kV/mm381 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.03
0.002

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
97 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

5 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

5 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

80 / 100
85 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1%
2.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
180°C356 °F

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

—
25°C77 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

5.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Energy (primary production) 110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

47 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
3

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSiliconeDental Resin

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityDental ResinSilicone
3D printingYes—
Default conditionStandardMedical Grade
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

Dental Resin vs Silicone — frequently asked

Is Dental Resin stronger than Silicone?

Yes. Dental Resin has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) for Silicone — about 6.9 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Dental Resin or Silicone?

Silicone is the lower-cost material: it sits in the premium tier ($$$) while Dental Resin is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Dental Resin or Silicone?

Dental Resin. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against poor (20/100) for Silicone; for welding the order is Silicone first (poor, 20/100) then Dental Resin (not recommended, 5/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Dental Resin and Silicone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.