FabDigitFabDigit

EVA Foam vs Silicone

Polymer · grade comparison

EVA Foam and Silicone are both polymer grades. Silicone is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) for EVA Foam, about 8.0 times as much. Silicone is the more ductile: elongation 500% versus 200% for EVA Foam. EVA Foam is lighter (0.06 g/cm³ vs 1.15 g/cm³ for Silicone) and EVA Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, EVA Foam machines more easily (excellent vs poor), EVA Foam welds better (very good vs poor), and EVA Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Silicone (premium, $$$).

EVA FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

SiliconeChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

EVA Foam vs Silicone: properties

EVA FoamSilicone

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa7.25×10⁻⁴ Msi
0 GPa3.19×10⁻⁴ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.3
0.49

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1 MPa0.15 ksi
8 MPa1.2 ksi

Elongation at Break

200%
500%

Compressive Strength

0.1 MPa0.01 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

0 GPa5.8×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.35 MPa0.05 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

30 Shore A
50 Shore A

Tear Strength

2 kN/m8.6 lbf/in
25 kN/m143 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

15%
20%

Shear Modulus

—
7.5×10⁻⁴ GPa1.09×10⁻⁴ Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.22 Msi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.06 g/cm³0 lb/in³
1.15 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

85°C185 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-30°C-22 °F
-125°C-193 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.5%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
—

Refractive Index

—
1.41

Light Transmission

—
88%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

180 µm/m·K100 µin/in·°F
270 µm/m·K150 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

55°C131 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
250°C482 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.4
3

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Dielectric Strength

—
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.002

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

UV / Weathering Resistance

35 / 100
97 / 100

Same in both: Corrosion Resistance 90 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

85 / 100
20 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
20 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
95 / 100

Polishability

10 / 100
85 / 100

Melt Flow Rate

2.5 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

160°C320 °F
25°C77 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

165°C329 °F
180°C356 °F

Same in both: Mold Shrinkage 2.5%

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.4 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

15%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

17 kN·m/kg
7 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.1 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
3

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleSiliconeEVA Foam

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityEVA FoamSilicone
Default conditionClosed CellMedical Grade
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Both are offered for Injection molding. Both take the same 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

EVA Foam vs Silicone — frequently asked

Is Silicone stronger than EVA Foam?

Yes. Silicone has a typical tensile strength of 8 MPa (1.16 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.145 ksi) for EVA Foam — about 8.0 times as much.

Which is cheaper, EVA Foam or Silicone?

EVA Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Silicone is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, EVA Foam or Silicone?

EVA Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against poor (20/100) for Silicone; for welding the order is EVA Foam first (very good, 70/100) then Silicone (poor, 20/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in EVA Foam and Silicone side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.