FabDigitFabDigit

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)

Polymer · grade comparison

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) are both polymer grades. Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber), about 10 times as much. In exchange, Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is the more ductile: elongation 160% versus 1.5% for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy). Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is lighter (0.32 g/cm³ vs 0.45 g/cm³ for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)) and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) machines more easily (very good vs good).

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)Choose it when strength drives the design.

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy): properties

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa2.61×10⁻⁴ Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

1 MPa0.17 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

160%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

0.05 MPa0.01 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Hardness, Shore A

20 Shore A
—

Tear Strength

2 kN/m11.4 lbf/in
—

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

8%
—

Shear Modulus

—
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

—
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

—
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Strength

—
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.7 MPa·√m0.64 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

—
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
80 HRM

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³
0.45 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-123°C-189 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

1.5%
0.1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

—
1.2%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

250 µm/m·K139 µin/in·°F
32 µm/m·K17.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

200°C392 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-55°C-67 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

26%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

260°C500 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
98°C208 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

5 kV/mm127 V/mil
9 kV/mm229 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.6
2

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.008

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

95 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

80 / 100
60 / 100

Formability (cold)

95 / 100
0 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
0.2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
70°C158 °F

Weldability

—
0 / 100

Polishability

—
20 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

250 L/kg30 gal/lb
—

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

4 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0 MN·m/kg
5.3 MN·m/kg

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilitySilicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) — frequently asked

Is Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) stronger than Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Yes. Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) has a typical tensile strength of 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) — about 10 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) or Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) or Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)?

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber). Its machinability rates very good (80/100) against good (60/100) for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.