FabDigitFabDigit

Phenolic Foam vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Polymer · grade comparison

Phenolic Foam and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) are both polymer grades. Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam, about 8.0 times as much. Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is the more ductile: elongation 160% versus 2% for Phenolic Foam. Phenolic Foam is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 0.32 g/cm³ for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)) and Phenolic Foam is stiffer (0.01 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, Phenolic Foam machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and Phenolic Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) (high, $$$$).

Phenolic FoamChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part is machined in volume.

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

Phenolic Foam vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber): properties

Phenolic FoamSilicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
0 GPa2.61×10⁻⁴ Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
1 MPa0.17 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
160%

Compressive Strength

0.16 MPa0.02 ksi
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.12 MPa0.02 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
20 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
2 kN/m11.4 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
8%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

3%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

8%
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
-123°C-189 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
250 µm/m·K139 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-180°C-292 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

42%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
260°C500 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.15
1.6

Dielectric Strength

—
5 kV/mm127 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

1 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
95 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
2.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
170°C338 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.4 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPhenolic FoamSilicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Phenolic Foam vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) — frequently asked

Is Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) stronger than Phenolic Foam?

Yes. Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) has a typical tensile strength of 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam — about 8.0 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Phenolic Foam or Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Phenolic Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Phenolic Foam or Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Phenolic Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Phenolic Foam and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.