FabDigitFabDigit

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) are both polymer grades. PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 3 MPa (0.363 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber), about 108% more. In exchange, Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is the more ductile: elongation 160% versus 10% for PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core). PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) is lighter (0.08 g/cm³ vs 0.32 g/cm³ for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)) and PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) is stiffer (0.1 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) machines more easily (excellent vs very good).

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Choose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber): properties

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core)Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.1 GPa0.01 Msi
0 GPa2.61×10⁻⁴ Msi

Shear Modulus

0.03 GPa0 Msi
—

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

3 MPa0.36 ksi
1 MPa0.17 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

1 MPa0.17 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

10%
160%

Compressive Strength

1 MPa0.2 ksi
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.09 GPa0.01 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

2 MPa0.29 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

0.08 GPa0.01 Msi
—

Shear Strength

1 MPa0.17 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

0.12 MPa·√m0.11 ksi·√in
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
20 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
2 kN/m11.4 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
8%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.08 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
-123°C-189 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

—
1.5%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.03 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

40 µm/m·K22.2 µin/in·°F
250 µm/m·K139 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-200°C-328 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

75°C167 °F
—

Limiting Oxygen Index

27%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
260°C500 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.12
1.6

Dielectric Strength

—
5 kV/mm127 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

15 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

25 / 100
95 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
2.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
170°C338 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

—
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

31 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.2 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core)

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core)Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) — frequently asked

Is PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) stronger than Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Yes. PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) has a typical tensile strength of 3 MPa (0.363 ksi) against 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) — about 108% more.

Which is cheaper, PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) or Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) or Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core). Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against very good (80/100) for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC Foam (Rigid, Structural Core) and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.