FabDigitFabDigit

Phenolic Foam vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)

Polymer · grade comparison

Phenolic Foam and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) are both polymer grades. Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam, about 80 times as much. In exchange, Phenolic Foam is the more ductile: elongation 2% versus 1.5% for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy). Phenolic Foam is lighter (0.05 g/cm³ vs 0.45 g/cm³ for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)) and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) is stiffer (2.4 GPa vs 0.01 GPa). On the shop floor, Phenolic Foam machines more easily (excellent vs good) and Phenolic Foam sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) (high, $$$$).

Phenolic FoamChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)Choose it when strength drives the design.

Phenolic Foam vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy): properties

Phenolic FoamSyntactic Foam (Epoxy)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.25
0.3

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.15 MPa0.02 ksi
12 MPa1.7 ksi

Elongation at Break

2%
1.5%

Compressive Strength

0.16 MPa0.02 ksi
48 MPa7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2.4 GPa0.35 Msi

Flexural Strength

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.01 GPa0 Msi
2.2 GPa0.32 Msi

Shear Strength

0.12 MPa0.02 ksi
15 MPa2.2 ksi

Shear Modulus

—
0.9 GPa0.13 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
0.7 MPa·√m0.64 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

—
20 J/m0.37 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

—
80 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

—
80 HRM

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.05 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.45 g/cm³0.02 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

3%
0.1%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

8%
1.2%

Glass Transition (Tg)

—
100°C212 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.02 W/m·K0.01 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.12 W/m·K0.07 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,400 J/kg·K0.33 BTU/lb·°F
1,100 J/kg·K0.26 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

25 µm/m·K13.9 µin/in·°F
32 µm/m·K17.8 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-180°C-292 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

42%
23%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

200°C392 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

—
98°C208 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

—
85°C185 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.15
2

Dielectric Strength

—
9 kV/mm229 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.008

Volume Resistivity

—
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

60 / 100
85 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

90 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

1 / 100
0 / 100

Formability (cold)

10 / 100
0 / 100

Polishability

—
20 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

—
0.2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
70°C158 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

95 MJ/kg40,843 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
6 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

3 kN·m/kg
27 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.3 MN·m/kg
5.3 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.4 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPhenolic FoamSyntactic Foam (Epoxy)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

Phenolic Foam vs Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) — frequently asked

Is Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) stronger than Phenolic Foam?

Yes. Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) has a typical tensile strength of 12 MPa (1.74 ksi) against 0.15 MPa (0.0218 ksi) for Phenolic Foam — about 80 times as much.

Which is cheaper, Phenolic Foam or Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)?

Phenolic Foam is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, Phenolic Foam or Syntactic Foam (Epoxy)?

Phenolic Foam. Its machinability rates excellent (90/100) against good (60/100) for Syntactic Foam (Epoxy).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in Phenolic Foam and Syntactic Foam (Epoxy) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.