FabDigitFabDigit

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) are both polymer grades. Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) against 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) for PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell), about 118% more. PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) is lighter (0.1 g/cm³ vs 0.32 g/cm³ for Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)) and PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) is stiffer (0 GPa vs 0 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) (high, $$$$).

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell)Choose it when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor.

Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber): properties

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell)Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0 GPa2.9×10⁻⁴ Msi
0 GPa2.61×10⁻⁴ Msi

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

0.55 MPa0.08 ksi
1 MPa0.17 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
160%

Compressive Strength

0.06 MPa0.01 ksi
0.05 MPa0.01 ksi

Compressive Modulus

8×10⁻⁴ GPa1.16×10⁻⁴ Msi
—

Shear Strength

0.3 MPa0.04 ksi
—

Hardness, Shore A

15 Shore A
20 Shore A

Tear Strength

2 kN/m8.6 lbf/in
2 kN/m11.4 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

20%
8%

Same in both: Poisson's Ratio 0.3

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.1 g/cm³0 lb/in³
0.32 g/cm³0.01 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

-30°C-22 °F
-123°C-189 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

2%
1.5%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

5%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.04 W/m·K0.02 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.08 W/m·K0.05 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F
1,300 J/kg·K0.31 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

80 µm/m·K44.4 µin/in·°F
250 µm/m·K139 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
200°C392 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-55°C-67 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

28%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
260°C500 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁰ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁷ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

1.3
1.6

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹² Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Dielectric Strength

—
5 kV/mm127 V/mil

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

82 / 100
95 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
95 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
80 / 100

Weldability

70 / 100
—

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
95 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

170°C338 °F
—

Mold Shrinkage

—
2.5%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
170°C338 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
130 MJ/kg55,890 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3.2 kg CO₂/kg
6.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
250 L/kg30 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

6 kN·m/kg
4 kN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.3 mm²/s
0.2 mm²/s

Same in both: Specific Stiffness (E / density) 0 MN·m/kg · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scale

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell)Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) vs Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) — frequently asked

Is Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) stronger than PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell)?

Yes. Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) has a typical tensile strength of 1 MPa (0.174 ksi) against 0.55 MPa (0.0798 ksi) for PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) — about 118% more.

Which is cheaper, PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) or Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

When should I choose PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) over Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber)?

Pick PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) when weight is the constraint, or when cost is the deciding factor. Pick Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC Foam (Flexible, Closed-Cell) and Silicone Foam (Sponge Rubber) side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.