FabDigitFabDigit

PVC-O vs PVC-P

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC-O and PVC-P are both polymer grades. PVC-O is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for PVC-P, about 4.9 times as much. In exchange, PVC-P is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 90% for PVC-O, and PVC-O is harder (82 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). PVC-P is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.4 g/cm³ for PVC-O) and PVC-O is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 0.03 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC-O machines more easily (very good vs fair), PVC-P welds better (excellent vs poor), and PVC-P sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PVC-O (standard, $$).

PVC-OChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PVC-PChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PVC-O vs PVC-P: properties

PVC-OPVC-P

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

78 MPa11.3 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

58 MPa8.4 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

90%
300%

Compressive Strength

65 MPa9.4 ksi
—

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
30 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

115 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
80 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
42 kN/m240 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
32%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

80°C176 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.35%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.2%
1%

Refractive Index

—
1.54

Light Transmission

—
82%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

45°C113 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

-10°C14 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

76°C169 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

70°C158 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

82°C180 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

43%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

60°C140 °F
100°C212 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.1
4.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.015
0.09

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
82 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

25 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

15 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
175°C347 °F

Mold Shrinkage

—
2%

Mold Temperature (typ.)

—
35°C95 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.5 kg CO₂/kg
2.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

56 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-O

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC-OPVC-P
Default condition——
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC-O vs PVC-P — frequently asked

Is PVC-O stronger than PVC-P?

Yes. PVC-O has a typical tensile strength of 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for PVC-P — about 4.9 times as much.

Which is cheaper, PVC-O or PVC-P?

PVC-P is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PVC-O is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PVC-O or PVC-P?

PVC-O. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against fair (35/100) for PVC-P; for welding the order is PVC-P first (excellent, 90/100) then PVC-O (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC-O and PVC-P side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.