FabDigitFabDigit

CPVC vs PVC-P

Polymer · grade comparison

CPVC and PVC-P are both polymer grades. CPVC is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for PVC-P, about 3.4 times as much. In exchange, PVC-P is the more ductile: elongation 300% versus 25% for CPVC, and CPVC is harder (82 Shore D vs 30 Shore D). PVC-P is lighter (1.25 g/cm³ vs 1.54 g/cm³ for CPVC) and CPVC is stiffer (3 GPa vs 0.03 GPa). On the shop floor, CPVC machines more easily (very good vs fair), PVC-P welds better (excellent vs good), and PVC-P sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than CPVC (standard, $$).

CPVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PVC-PChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

CPVC vs PVC-P: properties

CPVCPVC-P

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.03 GPa0 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.38
0.45

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

55 MPa8 ksi
16 MPa2.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

52 MPa7.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

25%
300%

Compressive Strength

75 MPa10.9 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
—

Flexural Modulus

3 GPa0.44 Msi
0.02 GPa0 Msi

Shear Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
10 MPa1.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

90 J/m1.7 ft·lbf/in
—

Hardness, Shore D

82 Shore D
30 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

118 HRR
—

Hardness, Shore A

—
80 Shore A

Tear Strength

—
42 kN/m240 lbf/in

Compression Set (22 h, 70 °C)

—
32%

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.54 g/cm³0.06 lb/in³
1.25 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

115°C239 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.04%
0.35%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.25%
1%

Refractive Index

1.55
1.54

Light Transmission

—
82%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.14 W/m·K0.08 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
1,200 J/kg·K0.29 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

68 µm/m·K37.8 µin/in·°F
150 µm/m·K83.3 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

93°C199 °F
70°C158 °F

Min Service Temperature

0°C32 °F
-30°C-22 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

118°C244 °F
—

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

103°C217 °F
—

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

115°C239 °F
60°C140 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

60%
26%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

105°C221 °F
100°C212 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹¹ Ω·m3.94×10¹⁸ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

22 kV/mm559 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.4
4.5

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.014
0.09

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹³ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

—
1×10¹³ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

85 / 100
82 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

55 / 100
50 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

75 / 100
35 / 100

Weldability

65 / 100
90 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
92 / 100

Polishability

55 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
2%

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
175°C347 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

55°C131 °F
35°C95 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

75 MJ/kg32,244 BTU/lb
68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

3 kg CO₂/kg
2.7 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

0%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

36 kN·m/kg
13 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
0 MN·m/kg

Thermal Shock Resistance Index

0
1

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCPVCPVC-P
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

CPVC vs PVC-P — frequently asked

Is CPVC stronger than PVC-P?

Yes. CPVC has a typical tensile strength of 55 MPa (7.98 ksi) against 16 MPa (2.32 ksi) for PVC-P — about 3.4 times as much.

Which is cheaper, CPVC or PVC-P?

PVC-P is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while CPVC is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, CPVC or PVC-P?

CPVC. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against fair (35/100) for PVC-P; for welding the order is PVC-P first (excellent, 90/100) then CPVC (good, 65/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in CPVC and PVC-P side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.