FabDigitFabDigit

PVC-M vs PVC-O

Polymer · grade comparison

PVC-M and PVC-O are both polymer grades. PVC-O is the stronger of the two: yield strength 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M, about 32% more; tensile strength follows at 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi). In exchange, PVC-M is the more ductile: elongation 100% versus 90% for PVC-O. PVC-O is stiffer (3.8 GPa vs 2.7 GPa) and PVC-M runs hotter in service (60°C vs 45°C continuous). On the shop floor, PVC-M welds better (very good vs poor) and PVC-M sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PVC-O (standard, $$).

PVC-MChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PVC-OChoose it when strength drives the design.

PVC-M vs PVC-O: properties

PVC-MPVC-O

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
3.8 GPa0.55 Msi

Shear Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

4 GPa0.61 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

47 MPa6.8 ksi
78 MPa11.3 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

44 MPa6.4 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Elongation at Break

100%
90%

Compressive Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
65 MPa9.4 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

72 MPa10.4 ksi
95 MPa13.8 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.7 GPa0.38 Msi
3.5 GPa0.51 Msi

Shear Strength

35 MPa5.1 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Izod Impact, Notched

600 J/m11.2 ft·lbf/in
400 J/m7.5 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

78 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

68 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

108 HRR
115 HRR

Same in both: Fracture Toughness (K_IC) 4.5 MPa·√m4.1 ksi·√in

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Glass Transition (Tg)

78°C172 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.1%
0.04%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.35%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.54
—

Same in both: Density 1.4 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Specific Heat Capacity

980 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F
950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

75 µm/m·K41.7 µin/in·°F
70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
45°C113 °F

Min Service Temperature

-20°C-4 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

71°C160 °F
76°C169 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

65°C149 °F
70°C158 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

78°C172 °F
82°C180 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

38%
43%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

70°C158 °F
60°C140 °F

Same in both: Thermal Conductivity 0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.016
0.015

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω
—

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

600 V
—

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 3.1 · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
92 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

58 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

78 / 100
70 / 100

Weldability

80 / 100
25 / 100

Formability (cold)

60 / 100
15 / 100

Polishability

50 / 100
45 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.3%
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

192°C378 °F
190°C374 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

40°C104 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

68 MJ/kg29,235 BTU/lb
65 MJ/kg27,945 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.8 kg CO₂/kg
2.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

130 L/kg15.6 gal/lb
500 L/kg59.9 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

34 kN·m/kg
56 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.9 MN·m/kg
2.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

359 kJ/m³
443 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePVC-OPVC-M

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPVC-MPVC-O
Default condition——
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PVC-M vs PVC-O — frequently asked

Is PVC-O stronger than PVC-M?

Yes. PVC-O has a typical yield strength of 58 MPa (8.41 ksi) against 44 MPa (6.38 ksi) for PVC-M — about 32% more. Tensile strength is 78 MPa (11.3 ksi) vs 47 MPa (6.82 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PVC-M or PVC-O?

PVC-M is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PVC-O is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PVC-M or PVC-O?

PVC-M, by a small margin. Both rate very good for machinability — 78/100 against 70/100 for PVC-O; for welding the order is PVC-M first (very good, 80/100) then PVC-O (poor, 25/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PVC-M and PVC-O side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.