FabDigitFabDigit

PP vs PVC

Polymer · grade comparison

PP and PVC are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PVC is the stronger of the two: yield strength 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) for PP, about 52% more; tensile strength follows at 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi). In exchange, PP is the more ductile: elongation 150% versus 45% for PVC, and PVC is harder (82 Shore D vs 72 Shore D). PP is lighter (0.91 g/cm³ vs 1.42 g/cm³ for PVC) and PVC is stiffer (3 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PVC machines more easily (excellent vs good).

PPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PVCChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is machined in volume.

PP vs PVC: properties

PPPVC

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.55 GPa0.08 Msi
1.1 GPa0.16 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.45 Msi
4 GPa0.61 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.42
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

35 MPa5.1 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

33 MPa4.8 ksi
50 MPa7.3 ksi

Elongation at Break

150%
45%

Compressive Strength

42 MPa6.1 ksi
68 MPa9.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

1.4 GPa0.2 Msi
2.9 GPa0.42 Msi

Flexural Strength

45 MPa6.5 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
3 GPa0.44 Msi

Shear Strength

25 MPa3.6 ksi
41 MPa5.9 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in
55 J/m1 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

72 Shore D
82 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

95 HRR
110 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

165°C329 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-10°C14 °F
80°C176 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.02%
0.06%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.1%
0.2%

Refractive Index

1.49
1.54

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.16 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
950 J/kg·K0.23 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

100°C212 °F
60°C140 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

105°C221 °F
75°C167 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

60°C140 °F
68°C154 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

90°C194 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
45%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
80°C176 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -10°C14 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
22 kV/mm559 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.25
3.1

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

3×10⁻⁴
0.015

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

20 / 100
55 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
85 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
90 / 100

Polishability

40 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.6%
0.4%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

230°C446 °F
185°C365 °F

Same in both: Formability (cold) 80 / 100 · Mold Temperature (typ.) 40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
67 MJ/kg28,805 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
2.4 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

100 L/kg12 gal/lb
120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

5%
10%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

39 kN·m/kg
37 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1.7 MN·m/kg
2.1 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

363 kJ/m³
417 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePPPVC

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPPPVC
3D printingYes—
Default conditionHomopolymerRigid (Type I)
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall0.5 mm0.5 mm
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µmRa 0.8 µm
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

Both are offered for CNC machining, Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PP vs PVC — frequently asked

Is PVC stronger than PP?

Yes. PVC has a typical yield strength of 50 MPa (7.25 ksi) against 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) for PP — about 52% more. Tensile strength is 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) vs 35 MPa (5.08 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PP or PVC?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PP or PVC?

PVC. Its machinability rates excellent (85/100) against good (60/100) for PP.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PP and PVC side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.