FabDigitFabDigit

LDPE vs PP

Polymer · grade comparison

LDPE and PP are both polymer grades, both corrosion resistant plastic. PP is the stronger of the two: yield strength 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE, about 3.3 times as much; tensile strength follows at 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi). In exchange, LDPE is the more ductile: elongation 450% versus 150% for PP, and PP is harder (72 Shore D vs 47 Shore D). PP is stiffer (1.5 GPa vs 0.22 GPa) and PP runs hotter in service (100°C vs 70°C continuous). On the shop floor, PP machines more easily (good vs fair).

LDPEChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

PPChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

LDPE vs PP: properties

LDPEPP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.22 GPa0.03 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.08 GPa0.01 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Bulk Modulus

2 GPa0.26 Msi
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

11 MPa1.6 ksi
35 MPa5.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

10 MPa1.5 ksi
33 MPa4.8 ksi

Elongation at Break

450%
150%

Compressive Strength

9 MPa1.3 ksi
42 MPa6.1 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.2 GPa0.03 Msi
1.4 GPa0.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

10 MPa1.5 ksi
45 MPa6.5 ksi

Flexural Modulus

0.25 GPa0.04 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Strength

8 MPa1.2 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.4 MPa·√m1.3 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore A

93 Shore A
—

Hardness, Shore D

47 Shore D
72 Shore D

Tear Strength

55 kN/m314 lbf/in
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
95 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.92 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.91 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

110°C230 °F
165°C329 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-10°C14 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.02%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.1%

Refractive Index

1.51
1.49

Light Transmission

80%
—

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.33 W/m·K0.19 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.22 W/m·K0.13 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F
1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

190 µm/m·K106 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
100°C212 °F

Min Service Temperature

-60°C-76 °F
-10°C14 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

47°C117 °F
105°C221 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

34°C93 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

50°C122 °F
90°C194 °F

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

90°C194 °F
130°C266 °F

Same in both: Limiting Oxygen Index 18%

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.28
2.25

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Dielectric Strength 25 kV/mm635 V/mil · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
92 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 20 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

45 / 100
60 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
92 / 100

Formability (cold)

90 / 100
80 / 100

Polishability

30 / 100
40 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
1.6%

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
12 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

190°C374 °F
230°C446 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

80 MJ/kg34,394 BTU/lb
78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

120 L/kg14.4 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
5%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

12 kN·m/kg
39 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

0.2 MN·m/kg
1.7 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

227 kJ/m³
363 kJ/m³

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.1 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleLDPEPP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityLDPEPP
CNC machining—Yes
3D printing—Yes
Default conditionUnfilledHomopolymer
Relative cost$ Budget$ Budget
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Conductive Coating—Yes
Dyeing (Nylon)—Yes
Primer Coating—Yes
Tinted Coating—Yes
Vacuum Metallization—Yes
Waterproof Coating—Yes

Both are offered for Sheet metal and Injection molding. They share 6 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Painting, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

LDPE vs PP — frequently asked

Is PP stronger than LDPE?

Yes. PP has a typical yield strength of 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) against 10 MPa (1.45 ksi) for LDPE — about 3.3 times as much. Tensile strength is 35 MPa (5.08 ksi) vs 11 MPa (1.6 ksi).

Which is cheaper, LDPE or PP?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($, budget); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, LDPE or PP?

PP. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for LDPE.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in LDPE and PP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.