FabDigitFabDigit

POM vs RTPU

Polymer · grade comparison

POM and RTPU are both polymer grades. POM is the stronger of the two: yield strength 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for RTPU, about 19% more; tensile strength follows at 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) vs 58 MPa (8.41 ksi). In exchange, RTPU is the more ductile: elongation 140% versus 30% for POM. RTPU is lighter (1.2 g/cm³ vs 1.41 g/cm³ for POM) and POM is stiffer (2.8 GPa vs 2.1 GPa). On the shop floor, POM machines more easily (excellent vs good), RTPU welds better (very good vs good), and POM sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than RTPU (premium, $$$).

POMChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

RTPUChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

POM vs RTPU: properties

POMRTPU

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

2.8 GPa0.41 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
—

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.45 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.35
0.4

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

63 MPa9.1 ksi
58 MPa8.4 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

62 MPa9 ksi
52 MPa7.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

30%
140%

Compressive Strength

105 MPa15.2 ksi
60 MPa8.7 ksi

Compressive Modulus

2.7 GPa0.39 Msi
2 GPa0.29 Msi

Flexural Strength

90 MPa13.1 ksi
72 MPa10.4 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.6 GPa0.38 Msi
2.1 GPa0.3 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in
800 J/m15 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

81 Shore D
78 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

80 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

120 HRR
115 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.2 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

166°C331 °F
—

Glass Transition (Tg)

-60°C-76 °F
100°C212 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.22%
0.3%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.8%
1.3%

Refractive Index

—
1.55

Light Transmission

—
85%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.2 W/m·K0.12 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
1,600 J/kg·K0.38 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F
85 µm/m·K47.2 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

95°C203 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

158°C316 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

104°C219 °F
80°C176 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

160°C320 °F
88°C190 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

15%
21%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

140°C284 °F
110°C230 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

20 kV/mm508 V/mil
24 kV/mm610 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.7
4

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.005
0.03

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

70 / 100
80 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

30 / 100
35 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

88 / 100
55 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
70 / 100

Formability (cold)

40 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
60 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2%
0.5%

Melt Flow Rate

9 g/10 min
15 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

200°C392 °F
215°C419 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

85°C185 °F
40°C104 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb
118 MJ/kg50,731 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

4.5 kg CO₂/kg
5.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

200 L/kg24 gal/lb
260 L/kg31.2 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

45 kN·m/kg
48 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

686 kJ/m³
644 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleRTPUPOM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPOMRTPU
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionUnfilled—
Relative cost$$ Standard$$$ Premium
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

POM vs RTPU — frequently asked

Is POM stronger than RTPU?

Yes. POM has a typical yield strength of 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) against 52 MPa (7.54 ksi) for RTPU — about 19% more. Tensile strength is 63 MPa (9.14 ksi) vs 58 MPa (8.41 ksi).

Which is cheaper, POM or RTPU?

POM is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while RTPU is premium ($$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, POM or RTPU?

POM. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against good (55/100) for RTPU; for welding the order is RTPU first (very good, 70/100) then POM (good, 55/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in POM and RTPU side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.