FabDigitFabDigit

PMMA vs POM

Polymer · grade comparison

PMMA and POM are both polymer grades. PMMA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for POM, about 10% more; tensile strength follows at 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 63 MPa (9.14 ksi). In exchange, POM is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 4.5% for PMMA, and PMMA is harder (89 Shore D vs 81 Shore D). PMMA is lighter (1.19 g/cm³ vs 1.41 g/cm³ for POM) and PMMA is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 2.8 GPa). On the shop floor, POM machines more easily (excellent vs very good) and PMMA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than POM (standard, $$).

PMMAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when weight is the constraint.

POMChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part sees heat.

PMMA vs POM: properties

PMMAPOM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.81 Msi
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.35

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
63 MPa9.1 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

4.5%
30%

Compressive Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.2 MPa·√m1.1 ksi·√in
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

89 Shore D
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

92 HRM
80 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
120 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
0.8%

Refractive Index

1.491
—

Light Transmission

92%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
166°C331 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
95°C203 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

96°C205 °F
158°C316 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
104°C219 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

105°C221 °F
160°C320 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
15%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
140°C284 °F

Same in both: Specific Heat Capacity 1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F · Min Service Temperature -40°C-40 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.7
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
0.005

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
70 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
88 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

240°C464 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
85°C185 °F

Same in both: Weldability 55 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

101 MJ/kg43,422 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.4 kg CO₂/kg
4.5 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

723 kJ/m³
686 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMMAPOM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMMAPOM
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Default conditionExtrudedUnfilled
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
PaintingYes—

Both are offered for Injection molding. They share 5 finishes: Chrome Plating (Plastic), EMI Shielding Coating, Soft Touch Coating, Spray Painting, UV Coating.

PMMA vs POM — frequently asked

Is PMMA stronger than POM?

Yes. PMMA has a typical yield strength of 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 62 MPa (8.99 ksi) for POM — about 10% more. Tensile strength is 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 63 MPa (9.14 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMMA or POM?

PMMA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while POM is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PMMA or POM?

POM. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against very good (70/100) for PMMA.

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMMA and POM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.