FabDigitFabDigit

COC vs POM

Polymer · grade comparison

COC and POM are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 60 MPa — strength does not separate them. POM is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 5% for COC. COC is lighter (1.02 g/cm³ vs 1.41 g/cm³ for POM) and COC is stiffer (3.1 GPa vs 2.8 GPa). On the shop floor, POM machines more easily (excellent vs good) and POM sits in a lower cost tier (standard, $$) than COC (high, $$$$).

COCChoose it when weight is the constraint, or when the part sees heat.

POMChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when the part is machined in volume.

COC vs POM: properties

COCPOM

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
2.8 GPa0.41 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.35

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

60 MPa8.7 ksi
62 MPa9 ksi

Elongation at Break

5%
30%

Flexural Strength

95 MPa13.8 ksi
90 MPa13.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

2.9 GPa0.42 Msi
2.6 GPa0.38 Msi

Izod Impact, Notched

21 J/m0.39 ft·lbf/in
70 J/m1.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Rockwell M

89 HRM
80 HRM

Shear Modulus

—
1.1 GPa0.15 Msi

Bulk Modulus

—
3 GPa0.45 Msi

Compressive Strength

—
105 MPa15.2 ksi

Compressive Modulus

—
2.7 GPa0.39 Msi

Shear Strength

—
55 MPa8 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

—
4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in

Hardness, Shore D

—
81 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
120 HRR

Same in both: Tensile Strength (Ultimate) 63 MPa9.1 ksi

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.02 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
1.41 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

138°C280 °F
-60°C-76 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.01%
0.22%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.01%
0.8%

Refractive Index

1.53
—

Light Transmission

91%
—

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
166°C331 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.15 W/m·K0.09 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.31 W/m·K0.18 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,500 J/kg·K0.36 BTU/lb·°F
1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

65 µm/m·K36.1 µin/in·°F
110 µm/m·K61.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

110°C230 °F
95°C203 °F

Min Service Temperature

-50°C-58 °F
-40°C-40 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

130°C266 °F
158°C316 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

123°C253 °F
104°C219 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

130°C266 °F
160°C320 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

19%
15%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

130°C266 °F
140°C284 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹² Ω·m3.94×10¹⁹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

45 kV/mm1,143 V/mil
20 kV/mm508 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
3.7

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

2×10⁻⁴
0.005

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁴ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

88 / 100
70 / 100

Same in both: UV / Weathering Resistance 30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
88 / 100

Weldability

50 / 100
55 / 100

Formability (cold)

55 / 100
40 / 100

Polishability

85 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.6%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

12 g/10 min
9 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

270°C518 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

110°C230 °F
85°C185 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

110 MJ/kg47,292 BTU/lb
100 MJ/kg42,992 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

—
200 L/kg24 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 4.5 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

62 kN·m/kg
45 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
2 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

581 kJ/m³
686 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleCOCPOM

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityCOCPOM
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—Unfilled
Relative cost$$$$ High$$ Standard
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

COC vs POM — frequently asked

What is the difference between COC and POM?

COC and POM are both polymer grades. Both yield at about 60 MPa — strength does not separate them. POM is the more ductile: elongation 30% versus 5% for COC.

Which is cheaper, COC or POM?

POM is the lower-cost material: it sits in the standard tier ($$) while COC is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, COC or POM?

POM. Its machinability rates excellent (88/100) against good (60/100) for COC; for welding the order is POM first (good, 55/100) then COC (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in COC and POM side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.