FabDigitFabDigit

PMMA vs PMP

Polymer · grade comparison

PMMA and PMP are both polymer grades. PMMA is the stronger of the two: yield strength 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for PMP, about 183% more; tensile strength follows at 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi). In exchange, PMP is the more ductile: elongation 20% versus 4.5% for PMMA, and PMMA is harder (89 Shore D vs 70 Shore D). PMP is lighter (0.83 g/cm³ vs 1.19 g/cm³ for PMMA) and PMMA is stiffer (3.2 GPa vs 1.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PMMA sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than PMP (high, $$$$).

PMMAChoose it when strength drives the design, or when cost is the deciding factor.

PMPChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PMMA vs PMP: properties

PMMAPMP

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.2 GPa0.46 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.2 GPa0.17 Msi
0.55 GPa0.08 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.81 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.37
0.42

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

70 MPa10.2 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

68 MPa9.9 ksi
24 MPa3.5 ksi

Elongation at Break

4.5%
20%

Compressive Strength

110 MPa16 ksi
—

Compressive Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
—

Flexural Strength

100 MPa14.5 ksi
32 MPa4.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.1 GPa0.45 Msi
1.5 GPa0.22 Msi

Shear Strength

60 MPa8.7 ksi
—

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

1.2 MPa·√m1.1 ksi·√in
—

Izod Impact, Notched

18 J/m0.34 ft·lbf/in
30 J/m0.56 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

89 Shore D
70 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

92 HRM
—

Hardness, Rockwell R

—
85 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.19 g/cm³0.04 lb/in³
0.83 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Glass Transition (Tg)

105°C221 °F
30°C86 °F

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.3%
0.01%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

2%
0.03%

Refractive Index

1.491
1.463

Melting Temperature (Tm)

—
235°C455 °F

Same in both: Light Transmission 92%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.19 W/m·K0.11 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.17 W/m·K0.1 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,470 J/kg·K0.35 BTU/lb·°F
2,100 J/kg·K0.5 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

70 µm/m·K38.9 µin/in·°F
117 µm/m·K65 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

70°C158 °F
150°C302 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-20°C-4 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

96°C205 °F
150°C302 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

88°C190 °F
60°C140 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

105°C221 °F
160°C320 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

95°C203 °F
200°C392 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

25 kV/mm635 V/mil
27 kV/mm686 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.7
2.12

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.02
7×10⁻⁵

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁶ Ω

Same in both: Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

80 / 100
88 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

92 / 100
25 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

70 / 100
65 / 100

Weldability

55 / 100
50 / 100

Formability (cold)

45 / 100
60 / 100

Polishability

96 / 100
70 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

0.5%
2%

Melt Flow Rate

2 g/10 min
26 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

240°C464 °F
285°C545 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

70°C158 °F
60°C140 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

101 MJ/kg43,422 BTU/lb
105 MJ/kg45,142 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

6.4 kg CO₂/kg
4.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

280 L/kg33.6 gal/lb
180 L/kg21.6 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

2%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

59 kN·m/kg
30 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

2.7 MN·m/kg
1.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

723 kJ/m³
192 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.1 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePMMAPMP

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPMMAPMP
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
Default conditionExtruded—
Relative cost$ Budget$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.5 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
UV CoatingYes—

PMMA vs PMP — frequently asked

Is PMMA stronger than PMP?

Yes. PMMA has a typical yield strength of 68 MPa (9.86 ksi) against 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) for PMP — about 183% more. Tensile strength is 70 MPa (10.2 ksi) vs 25 MPa (3.63 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PMMA or PMP?

PMMA is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while PMP is high ($$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PMMA or PMP?

PMMA. Its machinability rates very good (70/100) against good (65/100) for PMP; for welding the order is PMMA first (good, 55/100) then PMP (fair, 50/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PMMA and PMP side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.