FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK-ESD vs PEEK-GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK-ESD and PEEK-GF30 are both polymer grades. PEEK-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for PEEK-ESD, about 83% more. In exchange, PEEK-ESD is the more ductile: elongation 6% versus 2.5% for PEEK-GF30. PEEK-ESD is lighter (1.42 g/cm³ vs 1.51 g/cm³ for PEEK-GF30) and PEEK-GF30 is stiffer (10 GPa vs 4.2 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK-ESD machines more easily (good vs fair).

PEEK-ESDChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design.

PEEK-ESD vs PEEK-GF30: properties

PEEK-ESDPEEK-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

4.2 GPa0.61 Msi
10 GPa1.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.5 GPa0.22 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Poisson's Ratio

0.39
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

90 MPa13.1 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

88 MPa12.8 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

6%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

125 MPa18.1 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.8 GPa0.55 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

145 MPa21 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

4.3 GPa0.62 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

4 MPa·√m3.6 ksi·√in
5 MPa·√m4.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

45 J/m0.84 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

100 HRM
102 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.42 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.51 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.14%
0.11%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.4%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.43 W/m·K0.25 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

45 µm/m·K25 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

250°C482 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

185°C365 °F
340°C644 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

158°C316 °F
315°C599 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

305°C581 °F
330°C626 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
38%

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 310°C590 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

10,000 Ω·m3.94×10¹¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in

Volume Resistivity

1,000,000 Ω·cm
1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10⁷ Ω
1×10¹⁵ Ω

Dielectric Strength

—
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

—
3.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

—
0.005

Comparative Tracking Index (CTI)

—
150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

92 / 100
93 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

70 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

60 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

40 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

20 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

45 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.1%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

2.5 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Same in both: Processing Melt Temperature (typ.) 380°C716 °F · Mold Temperature (typ.) 190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

300 MJ/kg128,977 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Water

400 L/kg47.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Embodied Carbon (primary production) 13 kg CO₂/kg · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

63 kN·m/kg
109 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

3 MN·m/kg
6.6 MN·m/kg

Thermal Diffusivity

0.2 mm²/s
0.3 mm²/s

Same in both: Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK-ESD

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK-ESDPEEK-GF30
Default condition——
Relative cost$$$$ High$$$$ High
Min. machined wall——
Best machined surface——

PEEK-ESD vs PEEK-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PEEK-GF30 stronger than PEEK-ESD?

Yes. PEEK-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 90 MPa (13.1 ksi) for PEEK-ESD — about 83% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK-ESD or PEEK-GF30?

Both sit in the same relative cost tier ($$$$, high); the part price will be decided by machining time, tolerance and quantity rather than by the material.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK-ESD or PEEK-GF30?

PEEK-ESD. Its machinability rates good (60/100) against fair (45/100) for PEEK-GF30; for welding the order is PEEK-ESD first (fair, 40/100) then PEEK-GF30 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK-ESD and PEEK-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.