FabDigitFabDigit

PEEK As Printed vs PEEK GF30

Polymer · grade comparison

PEEK As Printed and PEEK-GF30 are both polymer grades, compared here in the As Printed condition. PEEK-GF30 is the stronger of the two: tensile strength 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PEEK As Printed, about 94% more. In exchange, PEEK As Printed is the more ductile: elongation 10% versus 2.5% for PEEK-GF30. PEEK As Printed is lighter (1.29 g/cm³ vs 1.51 g/cm³ for PEEK-GF30) and PEEK-GF30 is stiffer (10 GPa vs 3.5 GPa). On the shop floor, PEEK As Printed machines more easily (good vs fair), PEEK As Printed welds better (45 vs 35 out of 100), and PEEK-GF30 sits in a lower cost tier (high, $$$$) than PEEK As Printed (specialty, $$$$$).

PEEK As PrintedChoose it when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded, or when weight is the constraint.

PEEK-GF30Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part sees heat.

PEEK As Printed vs PEEK-GF30: properties

PEEK As PrintedPEEK-GF30

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

3.5 GPa0.51 Msi
10 GPa1.5 Msi

Shear Modulus

1.3 GPa0.19 Msi
3.6 GPa0.52 Msi

Bulk Modulus

6 GPa0.87 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.4
0.38

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

85 MPa12.3 ksi
165 MPa23.9 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

100 MPa14.5 ksi
—

Elongation at Break

10%
2.5%

Compressive Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
210 MPa30.5 ksi

Compressive Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
8 GPa1.2 Msi

Flexural Strength

130 MPa18.9 ksi
235 MPa34.1 ksi

Flexural Modulus

3.6 GPa0.52 Msi
9.7 GPa1.4 Msi

Shear Strength

55 MPa8 ksi
100 MPa14.5 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in
5 MPa·√m4.6 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

40 J/m0.75 ft·lbf/in
95 J/m1.8 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

86 Shore D
88 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell M

99 HRM
102 HRM

Hardness, Rockwell R

126 HRR
—

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

1.29 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³
1.51 g/cm³0.05 lb/in³

Water Absorption (24 h)

0.12%
0.11%

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.45%
0.4%

Same in both: Melting Temperature (Tm) 343°C649 °F · Glass Transition (Tg) 143°C289 °F

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.25 W/m·K0.14 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.43 W/m·K0.25 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,340 J/kg·K0.32 BTU/lb·°F
1,050 J/kg·K0.25 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

47 µm/m·K26.1 µin/in·°F
20 µm/m·K11.1 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

150°C302 °F
260°C500 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

315°C599 °F
340°C644 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

150°C302 °F
315°C599 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

315°C599 °F
330°C626 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

35%
38%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

300°C572 °F
310°C590 °F

Same in both: Min Service Temperature -60°C-76 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

21 kV/mm533 V/mil
19 kV/mm483 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

3.2
3.8

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

0.003
0.005

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 150 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

90 / 100
93 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

45 / 100
40 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

65 / 100
45 / 100

Weldability

45 / 100
35 / 100

Formability (cold)

30 / 100
10 / 100

Polishability

70 / 100
30 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

1.2%
0.3%

Melt Flow Rate

3 g/10 min
4 g/10 min

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

410°C770 °F
380°C716 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

130°C266 °F
190°C374 °F

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

290 MJ/kg124,678 BTU/lb
260 MJ/kg111,780 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

15 kg CO₂/kg
13 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

450 L/kg53.9 gal/lb
300 L/kg35.9 gal/lb

Same in both: Typical Recycled Content 0%

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scalePEEK

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPEEK As PrintedPEEK-GF30
CNC machiningYes—
Sheet metalYes—
Injection moldingYes—
3D printingYes—
Default conditionVirgin—
Relative cost$$$$$ Specialty$$$$ High
Min. machined wall0.8 mm—
Best machined surfaceRa 0.8 µm—
Chrome Plating (Plastic)Yes—
Conductive CoatingYes—
Dyeing (Nylon)Yes—
EMI Shielding CoatingYes—
PaintingYes—
Primer CoatingYes—
Soft Touch CoatingYes—
Spray PaintingYes—
Tinted CoatingYes—
UV CoatingYes—
Vacuum MetallizationYes—
Waterproof CoatingYes—

PEEK As Printed vs PEEK-GF30 — frequently asked

Is PEEK-GF30 stronger than PEEK As Printed?

Yes. PEEK-GF30 has a typical tensile strength of 165 MPa (23.9 ksi) against 85 MPa (12.3 ksi) for PEEK As Printed — about 94% more.

Which is cheaper, PEEK As Printed or PEEK-GF30?

PEEK-GF30 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the high tier ($$$$) while PEEK As Printed is specialty ($$$$$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PEEK As Printed or PEEK-GF30?

PEEK As Printed. Its machinability rates good (65/100) against fair (45/100) for PEEK-GF30; for welding the order is PEEK As Printed first (fair, 45/100) then PEEK-GF30 (fair, 35/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PEEK As Printed and PEEK-GF30 side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.