FabDigitFabDigit

PE100 vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

PE100 and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. PE100 is the stronger of the two: yield strength 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE, about 14% more. PE100 is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 350% for UHMW-PE. PE100 is stiffer (1 GPa vs 0.72 GPa) and UHMW-PE runs hotter in service (80°C vs 60°C continuous). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs good), PE100 welds better (excellent vs poor), and PE100 sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than UHMW-PE (standard, $$).

PE100Choose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when the part sees heat, or when the part is machined in volume.

PE100 vs UHMW-PE: properties

PE100UHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.39 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.45
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

33 MPa4.8 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
350%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

27 MPa3.9 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.1 GPa0.16 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.5 MPa·√m2.3 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

200 J/m3.7 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

62 Shore D
64 Shore D

Hardness, Rockwell R

55 HRR
50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.96 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

131°C268 °F
135°C275 °F

Glass Transition (Tg)

-110°C-166 °F
-120°C-184 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.03%
0.01%

Refractive Index

—
1.51

Same in both: Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.42 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

160 µm/m·K88.9 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Max Service Temperature (continuous)

60°C140 °F
80°C176 °F

Min Service Temperature

-40°C-40 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

72°C162 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

75°C167 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

18%
17%

Max Service Temperature (short-term)

80°C176 °F
110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Dielectric Constant (1 MHz)

2.35
2.3

Dissipation Factor (1 MHz)

5×10⁻⁴
3×10⁻⁴

Same in both: Electrical Resistivity 1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in · Volume Resistivity 1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm · Surface Resistivity 1×10¹⁴ Ω · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

95 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

88 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

58 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

95 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

82 / 100
55 / 100

Polishability

35 / 100
25 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

0.25 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

210°C410 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

30°C86 °F
—

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

77 MJ/kg33,104 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Same in both: Embodied Water 100 L/kg12 gal/lb · Typical Recycled Content 0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

34 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

288 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEPE100

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityPE100UHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

PE100 vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is PE100 stronger than UHMW-PE?

Yes. PE100 has a typical yield strength of 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 33 MPa (4.79 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, PE100 or UHMW-PE?

PE100 is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while UHMW-PE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, PE100 or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (58/100) for PE100; for welding the order is PE100 first (excellent, 95/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in PE100 and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.