FabDigitFabDigit

HMWPE vs UHMW-PE

Polymer · grade comparison

HMWPE and UHMW-PE are both polymer grades. HMWPE is the stronger of the two: yield strength 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE, about 14% more. HMWPE is the more ductile: elongation 700% versus 350% for UHMW-PE. HMWPE is stiffer (0.95 GPa vs 0.72 GPa). On the shop floor, UHMW-PE machines more easily (very good vs good), HMWPE welds better (excellent vs poor), and HMWPE sits in a lower cost tier (budget, $) than UHMW-PE (standard, $$).

HMWPEChoose it when strength drives the design, or when the part is bent, formed or impact-loaded.

UHMW-PEChoose it when the part is machined in volume.

HMWPE vs UHMW-PE: properties

HMWPEUHMW-PE

Mechanical

Strength, stiffness, ductility and hardness at room temperature.

Elastic (Young's) Modulus

0.95 GPa0.14 Msi
0.72 GPa0.1 Msi

Shear Modulus

0.35 GPa0.05 Msi
0.25 GPa0.04 Msi

Bulk Modulus

3 GPa0.38 Msi
—

Poisson's Ratio

0.44
0.46

Tensile Strength (Ultimate)

30 MPa4.4 ksi
40 MPa5.8 ksi

Yield Strength (0.2% offset)

24 MPa3.5 ksi
21 MPa3 ksi

Elongation at Break

700%
350%

Compressive Strength

22 MPa3.2 ksi
20 MPa2.9 ksi

Compressive Modulus

0.9 GPa0.13 Msi
0.6 GPa0.09 Msi

Flexural Strength

26 MPa3.8 ksi
25 MPa3.6 ksi

Flexural Modulus

1.1 GPa0.15 Msi
0.75 GPa0.11 Msi

Shear Strength

20 MPa2.9 ksi
22 MPa3.2 ksi

Fracture Toughness (K_IC)

2.8 MPa·√m2.5 ksi·√in
3.5 MPa·√m3.2 ksi·√in

Izod Impact, Notched

250 J/m4.7 ft·lbf/in
1,300 J/m24.3 ft·lbf/in

Hardness, Shore D

65 Shore D
64 Shore D

Same in both: Hardness, Rockwell R 50 HRR

Physical

Density and transition temperatures.

Density

0.95 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³
0.94 g/cm³0.03 lb/in³

Melting Temperature (Tm)

133°C271 °F
135°C275 °F

Water Absorption (Saturation)

0.02%
0.01%

Refractive Index

1.54
1.51

Same in both: Glass Transition (Tg) -120°C-184 °F · Water Absorption (24 h) 0.01%

Thermal

How each material carries heat and how hot it can run.

Thermal Conductivity

0.45 W/m·K0.26 BTU/hr·ft·°F
0.41 W/m·K0.24 BTU/hr·ft·°F

Specific Heat Capacity

1,900 J/kg·K0.45 BTU/lb·°F
1,840 J/kg·K0.44 BTU/lb·°F

Thermal Expansion (CTE, 20–100 °C)

160 µm/m·K88.9 µin/in·°F
200 µm/m·K111 µin/in·°F

Min Service Temperature

-100°C-148 °F
-200°C-328 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 0.45 MPa

77°C171 °F
80°C176 °F

Heat Deflection Temp. @ 1.8 MPa

46°C115 °F
44°C111 °F

Vicat Softening Point (B50)

125°C257 °F
80°C176 °F

Limiting Oxygen Index

17%
17%

Same in both: Max Service Temperature (continuous) 80°C176 °F · Max Service Temperature (short-term) 110°C230 °F

Electrical

Conductivity and insulation.

Electrical Resistivity

1×10¹⁴ Ω·m3.94×10²¹ µΩ·in
1×10¹³ Ω·m3.94×10²⁰ µΩ·in

Dielectric Strength

24 kV/mm610 V/mil
30 kV/mm762 V/mil

Volume Resistivity

1×10¹⁶ Ω·cm
1×10¹⁵ Ω·cm

Surface Resistivity

1×10¹⁵ Ω
1×10¹⁴ Ω

Same in both: Dielectric Constant (1 MHz) 2.3 · Dissipation Factor (1 MHz) 3×10⁻⁴ · Comparative Tracking Index (CTI) 600 V

Chemical & Environmental

Corrosion and environmental resistance (0–100 scores).

Corrosion Resistance

93 / 100
90 / 100

UV / Weathering Resistance

25 / 100
30 / 100

Manufacturability

FabDigit workshop ratings (0–100 scores) — how each material behaves on the machine.

Machinability

62 / 100
75 / 100

Weldability

92 / 100
15 / 100

Formability (cold)

78 / 100
55 / 100

Mold Shrinkage

2.5%
3%

Melt Flow Rate

0.1 g/10 min
—

Processing Melt Temperature (typ.)

215°C419 °F
200°C392 °F

Mold Temperature (typ.)

35°C95 °F
—

Same in both: Polishability 25 / 100

Sustainability

Primary-production footprint per kilogram.

Embodied Energy (primary production)

78 MJ/kg33,534 BTU/lb
85 MJ/kg36,543 BTU/lb

Embodied Carbon (primary production)

2.1 kg CO₂/kg
3.2 kg CO₂/kg

Embodied Water

110 L/kg13.2 gal/lb
100 L/kg12 gal/lb

Typical Recycled Content

10%
0%

Common Calculations

Ratios derived from the values above.

Specific Strength (UTS / density)

32 kN·m/kg
43 kN·m/kg

Specific Stiffness (E / density)

1 MN·m/kg
0.8 MN·m/kg

Modulus of Resilience

303 kJ/m³
306 kJ/m³

Same in both: Thermal Diffusivity 0.2 mm²/s · Thermal Shock Resistance Index 0

Strength versus weight

Yield strength against density for every polymer grade in the FabDigit library; the compared grades are highlighted. Up and left is stronger for its weight.

0.1110100123Density (g/cm³)Yield strength (MPa) — log scaleUHMW-PEHMWPE

Manufacturing and finishing

CapabilityHMWPEUHMW-PE
CNC machining—Yes
Sheet metal—Yes
Injection molding—Yes
Default condition—FDA
Relative cost$ Budget$$ Standard
Min. machined wall—0.5 mm
Best machined surface—Ra 0.8 µm
Chrome Plating (Plastic)—Yes
EMI Shielding Coating—Yes
Painting—Yes
Soft Touch Coating—Yes
Spray Painting—Yes
UV Coating—Yes

HMWPE vs UHMW-PE — frequently asked

Is HMWPE stronger than UHMW-PE?

Yes. HMWPE has a typical yield strength of 24 MPa (3.48 ksi) against 21 MPa (3.05 ksi) for UHMW-PE — about 14% more. Tensile strength is 30 MPa (4.35 ksi) vs 40 MPa (5.8 ksi).

Which is cheaper, HMWPE or UHMW-PE?

HMWPE is the lower-cost material: it sits in the budget tier ($) while UHMW-PE is standard ($$). Part price depends far more on geometry, tolerance and quantity than on raw stock — upload a CAD file for a live quote.

Which is easier to machine, HMWPE or UHMW-PE?

UHMW-PE. Its machinability rates very good (75/100) against good (62/100) for HMWPE; for welding the order is HMWPE first (excellent, 92/100) then UHMW-PE (poor, 15/100).

Ready to make it?

Upload a CAD file and FabDigit prices the part in HMWPE and UHMW-PE side by side — material, machining time, tolerance and finish in one quote. Certified material data ships with the order on request.

Typical handbook values for the conditions named above, normalised for comparison. Hardness on non-Brinell scales is converted approximately for charting only. Request certified data with your order for design-critical properties.